Open Access Opinion

What Does “One-Source of Truth” Imply in Business Strategy & Forecasting and Why Does it Matter?

Sanobar Syed*

Associate Director, University/Organisation: Beigene, Canada

Corresponding Author

Received Date: June 06, 2023;  Published Date: June 16, 2023


In the pharmaceutical world, market research & forecasting holds an important role and function in the central decisionmaking process. Typically, this function resides in the commercial excellence or business excellence function. There might be a global function and a local function which is responsible for the forecasting role. Market research & Forecasting is a critical function and influences many other functional areas within an organization. The cross functional relationships reflect the various uses to which a forecast outputs can be applied such as R& D forecasting, pipeline planning, revenue planning, sample and free goods, safety stock, supply & production planning, resource and budget allocation, project prioritization, partnering decisions, compensation plans, market access efforts etc. These varied uses, and the effect of forecasting on many functional areas in an organization, reflect the first major challenge of forecasting – meeting the needs of varied and diverse stakeholders. One shouldn’t create a single number forecast: if there’s variability due to lack of data then this needs to be shown either through sensitivity analysis or by creating a probability-based forecast. Any forecast, no matter what the market, is an estimate that will inevitably include inaccuracy. It’s a means of understanding both the risk and the potential of an investment. Therefore, it is essential that those who are basing their decision on the forecast understand both the range and the underlying drivers [1].

One of the emerging approaches in pharmaceutical research and forecasting is to blend and make forecasting as a bridge to narrow the outputs and approaches into “one single source of truth”. When all the key stakeholders are aligned it creates a unique forecasting blend and defines outcomes with better certainty [2]. A few years ago, multinational pharma companies seeking growth and respite from market uncertainty in Europe and the United States found a haven in emerging markets. Their rapid economic growth triggered an expansion in healthcare coverage and the emergence of a new cohort of consumers able to afford larger out-of-pocket spending on drugs. But early euphoria was soon replaced by a more somber outlook. Some emerging markets either suffered downturns or showed weaker growth forecasts as commodity prices fell; some healthcare systems struggled to scale up adequately their provision of care; and local companies became increasingly effective competitors in the pharma market. Furthermore, multinationals themselves often found it difficult to scale up in emerging markets, with challenges in talent recruitment, compliance, and organizational setup [3]. By contrast, developed markets like the United States were doing rather well. As launches become more complex, companies are looking towards strategic questions and specific launch and market insight requirements to build sustainable data leads in product launches. In addition to the need for customization, and thus the need to first understand each market and its characteristics fully, there are multiple other obstacles to tackling emerging markets. These include things like poor healthcare infrastructure, limited public funding, minimal or no intellectual property protection and regulations, complex market access regulations, and local competition, often in the form of generics.

The key challenge to forecasting is to create a process where the needs of function can be met without compromising the integrity of the forecast approach. The Key challenge is how will we create the “one source of truth” across the organization, especially when we have monthly, quarterly, annual, and other time intervals of forecasts. It also depends upon the frequency of inputs or data arriving in to churn out as forecast deliverables. The backbone of accurate forecasts are strong, rigorous models that can be deployed across various market scenarios. This provides a structured and articulated view of resource needs for operations, a key competitive advantage that reduces risk. For pharma organizations, factoring the impact of market access into product forecasts is becoming increasingly complicated. An analytical approach can help refine the forecast for treatment opportunity, brand selection and patient fulfillment. Coordinating forecasting capabilities across forecasting functions to ensure consistency in analysis, reporting, and operationalized analytics is the key to successful long-range planning, insights, strategy and action [4].

“One source of truth” becomes more imperative for organizations especially in an international and expansion mode.


A pharmaceutical forecast needs to model both a disease and a healthcare system, and the key to doing this well is using the available data to reflect this complexity in a way that supports effective decision-making. Generally speaking, a pharmaceutical market research and forecast needs to model both a disease and a healthcare system, and the key to doing this well is using the available data to reflect this complexity in a way that supports effective decision-making. There is a lot of data involved, but for that data to be valuable, it is important to consider how it is used, integrated, and delivered. Making the right decisions with the right information and insights will always be key for any business, and the challenge is to bring all these different elements together.

There is a lot of data involved, but for that data to be valuable, it is important to consider how it is used, integrated, and delivered. Making the right decisions with the right information and insights will always be key for any business, and the challenge is to bring all these different elements together. The “one source of truth” approach always triumphs in the organization.



Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.


  • Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2020) Erwerbstätigkeit,
  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2022) Dauer der Beschäftigung beim aktuellen Arbeitgeber,
  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2022) Ein Viertel aller Erwerbstätigen arbeitete 2021 im Homeoffice,
  • Nerdinger Friedemann W, Blickle Gerhard, Schaper Niclas (2014) Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer Pp. 51.
  • Kristof-Brown Amy, Zimmerman Ryan D, E Johnson (2005) Consequences of indi-viduals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. Personal Psychologie, 58: 284-287.
  • Hackman J Richard, Oldham Greg R (1980) Work redesign. Professional psychology 11(3): 447-448.
  • Gastil John (1994) A meta-analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. Small Group Research Pp. 384-410.
  • Bono Joyce, Judge Timothy (2004) Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology Pp.901-910.
  • Judge Timothy, Piccolo Ronald, Remus Ilies (2004) The forgotten ones? The validity of Con-sideration and Initiating Structure in leadership research. J Appl Psychol 89(1): 36-51.
  • Schyns Birgit, Schilling Jan (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta- analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly 24(1): 138-158.
  • Bruggemann Agnes (1976) Zur empirischen Untersuchung verschiedener Formen der Arbeitszufriedenheit. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft Pp.71-74.
  • Kauffeld Simone (2019) Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology for Bachelor. Heidelberg: Springer Pp. 240.
  • Felfe Jörg (2008) Mitarbeiterbindung. Göttingen: Hogrefe Pp. 26-165.
  • Kieser Alfred (1995) Loyalty and Commitment, Kieser Alfred, Reber Gerhard, Wunderer Rolf (eds.) Manual Dictionary of Leadership (2). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Pp. 1442-1456.
  • Herscovitch Lynne, Meyer John P, David J Stanley, Laryssa Topolnytsky (2002) Affective, continu-ance and normative commitment to organization: a Meta-Analysis of antecedents, correlated and consequenc-es. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61(1): 20-52.
  • Kim Peter B, Milne Simon, Park In Jo, Dan Zhu (2021) A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents of Career Commitment. Journal of Career Assessment 29(3): 502-524.
  • Van Dick Rolf (2017) Identifikation und Commitment fördern (2). Göttingen: Hogrefe pp. 42-56.
  • Biswas Mukesh K, Suar Damodar (2016) Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics 136(1): 57-72.
  • Dabirian Amir, Kietzmann Jan, Diba Hoda (2017) A great place to work!? Understanding crowdsourced employer branding. Business Horizons 60(2): 197-205.
  • Botella-Carrubi, Dolores Gil-Gomez, Hermenegildo Oltra-Badenes (2021) Employer branding factors as promoters of the dimensions of employee organizational commitment. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istražvanja 34(1): 1836-1849.
  • Blasco Francisca, Fernández-Lores, Susana Rodríguez-Tarodo (2014) Estudio mul-tinacional sobre la construcción de la marca del empleador. UCJC Business and Society Review 44: 34-35.
  • Nink Marco (2018) Engagement Index – The latest data and findings from the Gallup study. Munich: Redline Verlag Pp. 7.
  • Thiele Sabrina (2009) Work-Life-Balance zur Mitarbeiterbindung-Eine Strategie gegen den Fachkrä Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag pp. 50-55.
  • Ćulbrik Jelena, Delić Milan, Mitrović Slavica, Ćulbrik Dubravko (2018) Job satisfaction, Organiza-tional Commitment and Job Involvement: The Mediating Role of Job Involvement. Frontiers in Psychologie pp. 8-10.
  • Mabasa Fumani D, Mabasa Engetani L, Netshidzivhani MV (2016) The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among academic staff members in a selected higher education institution. Journal of WEI Business and Economics Pp. 38-45.
  • Kraus Rafaela, Woschée Ralph (2012) Applied psychology for project management. Heidelberg: Springer Pp. 193-195.
  • Stamouli Elena, Gerbeth Sebastian (2021) The moderating effect of emotional competence on job satisfaction and organisational commitment of healthcare professionals. BMC Health Services Research 21: 1257.
  • Lima Willy, Allida Daniel (2021) The Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment among Employees of a Selected Tertiary Educational Institution in Northwest Haiti. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences 2(1): 33-40.
  • Bao Lingfeng Li, Tao Xia (2020) How does Working from Home Affect Developer Productivity? - A Case Study of Baidu During COVID-19 Pandemic. Science China Information Sciences 65: 2-15.
  • Harker Martin, Brittany, MacDonnell (2012) Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Re-search Review 35(7): 602-616.
  • Wang Wendy, Albert Leslie, Sun Qin (2020) Employee isolation and telecommuter organizational commitment. Employee Relations: The International Journal 42(3): 609-621.
  • Ispen Christine, van Veldhoven, Marc, Kirchner (2021) Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmen-tal Research and Public Health 18(4): 3-17.
  • Wang Bin, Liu Yukun, Qian Jing, Parker Sharon (2020) Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective. International Association of Applied Psychology 70(1): 16-59.
  • Becker Cathrin, Thörel Eberhard, Nina Pauls, Anja S Göritz (2022) Homeoffice in Corona-Zeiten – Sind Ausmassund/oder Flexibilität wichtig für Arbeitszufriedenheit, soziale Unterstützung, Commitment und Arbeitsunterbrechungen. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) Wiesbaden: Springer 53(4): 173-187.
  • Vinke Axel (2005) Virtuelle Arbeitsstrukturen und organisationales Commitment - Das Büro als entscheidender Faktor sozialer Identifikation, Kahle Egbert (eds), Entscheidungs- und Organisationstheorie, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage pp. 230-235.
  • Chakra Raja, Charef Fatima (2022) The effect of telework on organizational commitment, case of IT Engineers Casablanca Rabat region. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics 3(3-2): 596-611.
  • Mary Sheela (2020) Impact of remote work on work commitment. European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine 7(8): 2281-2282.
  • Harabi Najib, Hespeler Frank (2001) The diffusion of telework: where does Switzerland stand today in an international comparison? Results of an empirical study. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Pp. 27.
  • Hunton James E, Norman Carolyn S (2010) The Impact of Alternative Telework Arrangements on Organizational Commitment: Insights from a Longitudinal Field Experiment. Journal of Information Systems 24(1): 67-90.
  • Kapusy Kata, Pataki-Bittó Fruzsina (2021) Work environment transformation in tne post COVID-19 base on work values of the future workforce. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 23(3): 151-169.
  • Forbes Magazine (2022) In-Office vs. Remote vs. Hybrid work two years later: The impact on Em-ployee Efficiency,
  • Ahlers Elke, Mierich Sandra, Zucco Aline (2021) Was wir aus der Zeit der Pandemie für die zukünftige Gestaltung von Homeoffice lernen kö Wirschaftschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung WSI-Report 65: 30.
  • Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne Kempermann, Astrid Verhaegh, et al. (2022) How to attract employees back to the office? A stated choice study on hybrid working prefer-ences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 81: 101784.
  • Earle Heather (2003) Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management 2(3): 244-257.
  • Deloitte (2023) Core beliefs and culture
  • Bakker Arnold B, Demerouti Evangelia (2007) The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22(3): 309-328.
  • Grunau Philip, Ruf Kevin, Steffes Susanne, Wolter Stefanie (2019) Mobile Arbeitsformen aus Sicht von Betrieben und Beschäftigten: Homeoffice bietet Vorteile, hat aber auch Tü ZEW-Kurzexpertise 19(3): 4-6.
  • Röhr Susanne, Müller Felix, Franziska Jung, Christian Apfelbacher, Andreas Seidler, et al. (2020) Psychosoziale Folgen von Quarantänemaßnahmen bei schwerwiegenden Coronavirus-Ausbrüchen: ein Rapid Review. Psychiatrische Praxis 47(4): 179-189.
  • Bentley Tim A, Teo Stephen TT, McLeod L, F Tan, R Bosua, et al. (2016) The role of organizational support in teleworker wellbeing: a sociotechnical systems approach. Applied Ergo-nomics 52: 207-214.
  • Golden Veiga (2008) The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satis-faction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly 19(1): 77-88.
  • Citation
    Signup for Newsletter
    Scroll to Top