Modeling the Transport of Enteric Virus Pressured by Variation of Velocity in Heterogeneous Coarse Deposition in Coastal Environment

In recent two decades, several of experts have carried out studies on batch, flowing column, this also includes field experiments on the subsurface viral performance. Good number of the processes affected in ground water viral fate and transport, results on permanent removal of virus from through irreparable attachment, reversible attachment, and inactivation developed only irreversible attachment. Properties of virus has been observed controlled ground [1-4], the properties of the porous medium [5,6], and the properties of water transporting the virus [7-11]. This process of governing virus fate and transport were observed not to be based on the fact that the study never considers all the controlling factors from the three aspects listed. [12-14] The electrostatic attraction and repulsion, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic influences are three foremost forces accountable for communication between the virus and the porous medium [15-19].

Nomenclature:

C = Enteric Virus Concentration

A(x) = void Ratio /Porosity of soil

B(x) = Permeability of Soil

C-n-[α¹x] = Velocity of Flow

x = Depth

Transform the above Bernoulli’s Equation to a linear first order DE gives:

Use I.F to Solve (2) above

Hence, the general Solution becomes:

Standard laboratory experiment where performed to monitor Enteric Virus using the standard method for the experiment at different formation, the soil deposition of the strata were collected in sequences base on the structural deposition of the lithology at different locations, this samples collected at different location generated variations at different depths producing different Enteric Virus concentration through column experiment, from the pressure flow at different strata, the experimental result were compared with the theoretical values for the validation of the model.

Results and discussion are presented in Tables 1-7 including graphical representation for Enteric Virus concentration.

Table 1: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 2: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 3: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 4: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 5: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 6: Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

Table 7:Predictive and experimental values of enteric virus concentration at different depth.

The study graphical representation from Figure 1-6 shows the behavior of the system in terms of the deposition of enteric virus and its transport process, linear trend were observed from the deposition of enteric virus in the coarse structural deposition, the study experienced linear exponential growth on the concentration of the contaminant, but the heterogeneity were not experienced on the rate of migration but through the variation of concentration in different location, the simulation values monitored the system in different conditions and find out that the concentration reduce with respect to variations of velocity of fluid flow in various location, these were expressed in different graphical representation, the concentration at various figures were heterogeneous, the study experienced the rate of transport process and observed influenced from velocity heterogeneous deposition in coarse formation, such condition also explained from the figure that the velocity of fluid transports contaminants reflect its behavior based on this factors in this stratum depositions. The study also observed other conditions such as microelement that may also express its positive impact on the contaminant by increasing their populations, the fluctuation of concentration are observed from variation of concentration from figure one at highest concentration in three meters, while the lowest concentration were experienced in figure six at three and hundred meters. Validation of simulation results were subject to experimental data and both parameters developed best fits correlation.

The study has monitored the system applying non-homogeneous system, this application was used to monitor the behavior of enteric virus in heterogeneous coarse deposition, this study developed this concept to adopt in deltaic and non-deltaic environment, and the derived model generated the applied techniques to predict the heterogeneous velocity of flow influence on the migration of enteric virus in heterogeneous coarse formation. The study express variation of velocity influenced on concentration of enteric virus in different simulation , these are where the concentrate growth rate determined the rate of velocity deposition in heterogeneous coarse formation, linear trend were experienced to the optimum value, but the concentration are not homogeneous due to fluctuation influenced from velocity of flow, the study observed linear condition on the trend, but the actual concentration are not linear, the optimum concentration are based on the lowest velocity of flow were accumulation of contaminant are experienced in the formation. This implies that the velocity of flow from the research study reflect the rate of enteric virus contamination in different depositions.

None.

No conflict of interest.

1. Huade G Dirk S Makuch, Steve S, Suresh PD (2003) The Effect of Critical pH on Virus Fate and Transport in Saturated Porous Medium 41(5): 701- 708.
2. Deborde DC, WW Woessner, QT Kiley, P Ball (1999) Rapid transport of viruses in a floodplain aquifer. Dowd, SE, SD Pillai, S Wang, MY Corapcioglu, Water Research 33(10): 2229-2238.
3. Schijven JF, SM Hassanizadeh, SE Dowd, SD Pillai (2001) Modeling virus adsorption in batch and column experiments. Quantitative Microbiology 2(1): 5-20.
4. Woessner WW, PN Ball, DC Deborde, TL Troy (2001) Viral transport in a sand and gravel aquifer under field pumping conditions. Ground Water 39(6): 886-894.
5. Loveland JP, JN Ryan, GL Amy, RW Harvey (1996) The reversibility of virus attachment to mineral surfaces Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 107: 205-221.
6. Pieper AP, JN Ryan, RW Harvey, GL Amy, TH Illangasekare, et al. (1997) Transport and recovery of bacteriophage PRD1 in a sand and gravel aquifer: Effect of sewage -derived organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology 31(4): 1163-1170.
7. Eluozo SN, Ademiluyi, JO, Nwaoburu AO (2011) Model Development Approach to Predict the Behaviour of E. coli Transport on Stationary Phase in Khana, Deltaic Environment of Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Current Research 3(7): 140-145.
8. Eluozo SN (2012) Mathematical Model to Predict Klebsiella Pneumonae Transport influenced by Porosity and Void Ratio in Shallow Aquifers. ARPN Journal of Earth Science 1(2): 2305-493.
9. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Mathematical Model to Monitor the deposition of Void ratio and Dispersion of Phosphorous Influenced in salmonella Growth Rate in Coarse and Gravel Formation in Borikiri, Rivers State of Nigeria. American Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Research 1(4): 59-67.
10. Bales RC, S Li, KM Maguire, MT Yahya, CP Gerba (1993) MS-2 and poliovirus transport in porous medium: Hydrophobic effects and chemical perturbations. Water Resources Research 29(4): 957-963.
11. Bales RC, S Li, TCJ Yeh, ME Lenczewski, CP Gerba (1997) Bacteriophage and microsphere transport in saturated porous medium: Force-gradient experiment at Borden, Ontario. Water Resource Research 33: 639-648.
12. Redman JA, SB Grant, TM Olson, JM Adkins, JL Jackson, et al. (1999) Physicochemical mechanisms responsible for the filtration and mobilization of a filamentous bacteriophage in quartz sand. Water Research 33(1): 43-52.
13. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Mathematical Model to Predict Adsorption Rate of Potassium Influenced by Permeability in Lateritic and Silty Formation in Coastal Area of Eagle Island, Port Harcourt, Niger Delta of Nigeria. International Journal Sustainable Energy and Environment 1(5): 111-119.
14. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Modeling the Deposition Adsorption Rate of Carbon Influenced by Porosity in Semi Confined Bed in Okirika, Rivers State of Nigeria. International Journal of sustainable Energy and Environment 1(5): 103-110.
15. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Mathematical Model to Predict the Migration of Cryptosporidium in Homogeneous Formation in Obio- Akpor, Rivers State of Nigeria. International Journal Applied Chemical Science Research 1(6): 83-94.
16. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Modeling the Transport of Arsenic on Pore Fluid and Solid Surface in Heterogeneous Soil Formation, Niger Delta of Nigeria. World Journal of Science and Technology Research 1(6): 124-134.
17. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Mathematical Model to Predict Transient Flow Influenced by Compressible Fluid in Non-Homogeneous Anisotropic Aquifer in Deltaic Environment. Sjournals: Engineering Science and Technology, pp.1-9.
18. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Mathematical Modeling and Simulation to Predict the transport of Diplococcic in Homogeneous Unconfined Aquifer in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Niger delta of Nigeria International Journal of Materials, Methods and Technology 1(5): 103-115.
19. Eluozo SN, Nwaoburu AO (2013) Model Evaluation to Predict Nitrogen Depositions influenced by Porosity and Cadmium Inhibition in Coastal area of Port Harcourt. American Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Research 1(8): 128-140.