Review Article
Opportunities For Greener Production Through Robotics Systems in Green Factories
Cyryl Garus*
Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg RWTH Aachen, Germany
Cyryl Garus, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg RWTH Aachen, Germany
Received Date: September 11, 2024; Published Date: September 26, 2024
Abstract
As global environmental challenges intensify, the need for sustainable industrial practices has become increasingly critical. Robotics, a key technological advancement, is pivotal in the evolution of “Green Factories,” which aim to minimize environmental impact while enhancing efficiency, resource utilization, and energy conservation. This article explores how robotics systems, including collaborative robots (cobots), contribute to greener production processes by improving precision, reducing waste, and optimizing energy use. Additionally, the integration of robotics into the modern workplace aligns with emerging trends such as Green New Work and the flexibilization of work environments, offering significant ecological benefits. However, while robotics presents vast opportunities for sustainable manufacturing, challenges such as the environmental impact of robot production and the potential social consequences of increased automation must be carefully managed. This article argues that, with strategic planning and implementation, robotics can be a powerful catalyst in the transition to a more sustainable and adaptive industrial future.
Introduction
As global environmental concerns grow, the urgency for sustainable industrial practices becomes increasingly evident. One of the most promising technologies driving this transition is robotics, which plays a crucial role in the development of “Green Factories.”[1-4]. These factories not only reduce environmental impact but also enhance efficiency, resource utilization, and energy conservation [5,6]. Additionally, robotics intersects with modern workplace trends, such as collaborative robotics (cobotics) [7], the concept of “Green New Work,” and flexible work environmentsall of which have significant ecological implications [8]. This article explores how robotics systems can revolutionize green manufacturing and contribute to a more sustainable and adaptive industrial future.
Precision, Efficiency, and Collaborative Robotics (Cobotics)
Robotics systems have long been valued for their precision and efficiency in manufacturing, which directly contribute to ecological sustainability [8]. Traditional manufacturing processes often lead to material waste due to human error and the limitations of less sophisticated machinery. Robotics, equipped with advanced sensors and AI-driven algorithms, optimize production lines by managing raw materials and energy more accurately [5]. This precision maximizes resource utilization, reduces waste, and minimizes environmental footprints. Cobots, or collaborative robots, introduce an additional layer of sustainability. Designed to work alongside human workers, cobots combine the precision of robotics with the flexibility and decision-making abilities of humans [9,10]. This synergy enhances the efficiency of production processes while maintaining a human-centric approach [7]. Automating repetitive and physically demanding tasks allows workers to focus on complex, creative, and decision-driven activities [11]. This not only improves worker satisfaction and productivity [12] but also contributes to a more sustainable production environment by leveraging human expertise alongside robotic precision [13-15].
Energy Conservation and Green New Work
Energy conservation is a cornerstone of green factories, and robotics plays a pivotal role in achieving this goal [16] Unlike human workers, robots can operate continuously without breaks, enabling more efficient use of production time and energy. Advanced robotic systems can optimize energy consumption, adjusting operational intensity based on real-time energy availability from renewable sources [17]. This dynamic energy management is especially effective when integrated with smart grids, where energy supply can fluctuate depending on solar or wind power availability [18- 19].
In the context of “Green New Work,” robotics supports the transition to more sustainable work environments. This concept emphasizes the integration of green technologies and practices into the workplace, promoting sustainability at both the organizational and individual levels [20, 3]. By automating energy-intensive tasks and reducing the reliance on fossil fuels, robots contribute to a greener industrial ecosystem. Additionally, the use of robotics in remote monitoring and control allows for greater flexibility in work arrangements, enabling workers to operate and oversee production processes from remote locations. This reduces the need for physical presence in factories, leading to lower commutingrelated emissions and a smaller overall carbon footprint [11] [20- 22].
Flexibilization of the workplace and ecological benefits
The flexibilization of the workplace, driven by advancements in robotics and digital technologies, offers significant ecological benefits [6]. As robots take over repetitive, high-risk, and physically demanding tasks, the need for large, centralized production facilities diminishes [11]. This shift enables the decentralization of manufacturing, were smaller, localized production units can be established closer to the end consumer. Such a model reduces transportation-related emissions and allows for more responsive, just-in-time production, minimizing waste and excess inventory [23]. Moreover, flexible work arrangements, facilitated by robotics and digital communication tools, support a more sustainable work-life balance. Remote work, enabled by advanced robotics and automation, reduces the need for daily commuting, which in turn decreases fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions [22, 24]. Additionally, the ability to adapt work schedules to energy availability-such as aligning production with off-peak hours when renewable energy is more abundant-further enhances the ecological sustainability of the workplace [19].
Waste reduction, circular economy, and cobotic synergy
Waste reduction is another area where robotics and cobotics can make a significant impact. Robots are instrumental in implementing circular economy practices by facilitating the recycling and reuse of materials [25]. Disassembly robots, for instance, can efficiently break down products at the end of their lifecycle, ensuring that components are recycled or refurbished rather than discarded. This process not only conserves resources but also prevents potentially hazardous waste from entering the environment [26- 28]. Cobots, with their ability to work closely with humans, can enhance these processes by combining robotic precision with human judgment [11, 29]. For example, cobots can assist workers in identifying and sorting recyclable materials, improving the efficiency of recycling operations. Additionally, cobots can be used in tasks such as quality control, ensuring that recycled materials meet the required standards for reuse. This collaboration between humans and robots supports the principles of a circular economy, reducing the demand for virgin raw materials and minimizing the overall environmental impact of production [26, 30].
Reduction of Harmful Emissions
Robotics also plays a vital role in reducing harmful emissions associated with industrial processes [31,32]. In manufacturing environments where toxic chemicals or high levels of pollutants are present, robots can take over tasks that would otherwise expose human workers to hazardous conditions. For example, in painting or coating operations, robots can apply materials more evenly and with greater precision, significantly reducing the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere [11, 32]. Cobots can further enhance these efforts by assisting in the monitoring and control of emissions. By working alongside human operators, cobots can provide real-time data on emissions levels, enabling immediate adjustments to production processes to minimize pollutants. This collaborative approach ensures that emissions are not only reduced but also continuously monitored, contributing to a safer and more environmentally responsible production environment [33, 34].
Challenges and Considerations
While the integration of robotics and cobotics in green factories presents numerous opportunities, there are also challenges that must be addressed. The production and maintenance of robotics systems themselves have environmental impacts, including the energy required for their manufacture and the potential for electronic waste at the end of their lifecycle [11]. To fully realize the ecological benefits, it is essential that the development of robotics systems follows sustainable practices, such as using recyclable materials and de-signing for easy disassembly and recycling. Another important consideration is the social impact of increased automation. As robotics and cobotics systems take over tasks traditionally performed by humans, there could be significant job displacement, particularly in regions heavily reliant on manual labor [35, 36]. It is crucial to balance the ecological benefits of automation with the need for social sustainability, ensuring that workers are retrained and supported in transitioning to new roles within the green economy.
Conclusion
The integration of robotics systems, including cobots, in green factories represents a transformative step toward sustainable manufacturing and a modern, flexible work environment. By enhancing precision, conserving energy, reducing waste and emissions, and optimizing supply chains, robotics can significantly contribute to reducing the environmental impact of industrial production. Moreover, the adoption of robotics in line with the principles of Green New Work and the flexibilization of the workplace further amplifies these benefits, paving the way for a more adaptive and sustainable industrial future. However, achieving these benefits requires a holistic approach that considers both the technological advancements and the environmental and social implications of robotics in manufacturing. With careful planning and thoughtful implementation, robotics can be a powerful tool in the transition to a greener, more sustainable, and flexible industrial landscape.
Acknowledgement
None.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
References
- Vrchota J, Pech M, Rolínek L, Bednář J (2020) Sustainability Outcomes of Green Processes in Relation to Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Systematic Review. Sustainability 12: 5968.
- Braccini AM, Margherita EG (2019) Exploring Organizational Sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the Triple Bottom Line: The Case of a Manufacturing Company. Sustainability 11(1): 36.
- Khang A, Akhai S (2024) Green Intelligent and Sustainable Manufacturing: Key Advancements, Benefits, Challenges, and Applications for Transforming Industry. Machine Vision and Industrial Robotics in Manufacturing, 405-417.
- Mueller F, Cannata A, Stahl B, Taisch M, Thiede S, et al. (2013) Green Factory Planning. In: Prabhu V, Taisch M, Kiritsis D (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Sustainable Pro-duction and Service Supply Chains. APMS 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Vol 414.
- Matsuda M, Kimura F (2013) Usage of a digital eco-factory for green production preparation. Procedia CIRP 7: 181-186.
- Bogue R (2022) The role of robots in the green economy. Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application 49(1): 6-10.
- Ivanov D (2022) The industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research 61(5): 1683-1695.
- Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Suman R (2021) Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cognitive Robotics 1: 58-75.
- Simões AC, Pinto A, Santos J, Pinheiro S, Romero D (2022) Designing human-robot collaboration (HRC) workspaces in industrial settings: A systematic literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 62: 28-43.
- Hentout A, Aouache M, Maoudj A, Akli I (2019) Human-robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008-2017. Advanced Robotics 33(15-16): 764-799.
- Weidemann C, Mandischer N, Van Kerkom F, Corves B, Hüsing M, et al. (2023) Literature Review on Recent Trends and Perspectives of Collaborative Robotics in Work 4.0. Robotics 12(3): 84.
- Cherubini A, Passama R, Crosnier A, Lasnier A, Fraisse P (2016) Collaborative manufacturing with physical human-robot interaction. Robot. -Comput.Integr. Manuf. 40: 1-13
- Meziane R, Li P, Otis MJD, Ezzaidi H, Cardou P (2014) Safer hybrid workspace using human-robot interaction while sharing production activities. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) Proceedings, Timisoara, Romania 16(18): 37-42
- Segura Pablo, Odette Lobato-Calleros, Alejandro Ramírez-Serrano, Isidro Soria (2021) Human-robot collaborative systems: Structural components for current manufacturing applications. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 3: 100060.
- Pauliková A, Gyurák Babeľová Z, Ubárová M (2021) Analysis of the Impact of Human-Cobot Collaborative Manufacturing Implementation on the Occupational Health and Safety and the Quality Requirements. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(4): 1927.
- Wen X, Sun Y, Ma H L, Chung SH (2022) Green smart manufacturing: energy-efficient robotic job shop scheduling models. International Journal of Production Research 61(17): 5791-5805.
- Soori M, Arezoo B, Dastres R (2023) Optimization of energy consumption in industrial robots, a review. Cognitive Robotics 3: 142-157.
- Yamamoto T, Hayama H, Hayashi T, Mori T (2020) Automatic Energy-Saving Operations System Using Robotic Process Automation. Energies 13(9): 2342.
- Hassan AA, El Habrouk M, Deghedie S (2020) Renewable Energy for Robots and Robots for Renewable Energy - A Review. Robotica 38(9):1576-1604.
- Chen Y, Cheng L, Lee CC (2022) How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence. Ecological Economics 198: 107483.
- Lee CC, Qin S, Li Y (2022) Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change183: 121893.
- Bilancia P, Schmidt J, Raffaeli R, Peruzzini M, Pellicciari M (2023) An Overview of Industrial Robots Control and Programming Approaches. Applied Sciences 13(4): 2582.
- Wang B, Tao F, Fang X, Liu C, Liu Y, et al. (2021) Smart manufacturing and intelligent manufacturing: A comparative review. Engineering 7(6): 738-757.
- Romero D, Bernus P, Noran O, Stahre J, Fast-Berglund Å (2016) The Operator 4.0: Human Cyber-Physical Systems & Adaptive Automation Towards Human-Automation Symbiosis Work Systems. In: Nääs, I., et al. Advances in Production Management Systems. Initiatives for a Sustainable World. APMS 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 488.
- Pizoń J, Cioch M, Kański Ł, Sánchez-García E (2022) Cobots implementation in the era of Industry 5.0 using modern business and management solutions.
- Löffler S (2024) Human-robot collaboration for efficient circularity decision-making for end-of-usage products (Doctoral dissertation, Reutlingen University).
- Chen Y, Luo Y, Yerebakan MO, Xia S, Behdad S, Hu B (2022) Human workload and ergonomics during human-robot collaborative electronic waste disassembly. In 2022 IEEE 3rd international conference on human-machine systems (ICHMS), pp. 1-6.
- Ramadurai S, Jeong H (2022, March) Effect of human involvement on work performance and fluency in human-robot collaboration for recycling. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 1007-1011.
- Calvo R Gil P (2022) Evaluation of Collaborative Robot Sustainable Integration in Manufacturing Assembly by Using Process Time Savings. Materials 15(2): 611.
- Xiao J, Huang K (2024) A comprehensive review on human–robot collaboration remanufacturing towards uncertain and dynamic disassembly. Manufacturing Review 11: 17.
- Han W Z, Zhang YM (2024) Carbon reduction effect of industrial robots: Breaking the impasse for carbon emissions and development. Innovation and Green Development 3(3): 100158.
- Lin B, Xu C (2024) The effects of industrial robots on firm energy intensity: From the perspective of technological innovation and electrification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 203: 123373.
- Guo J, Chang S, Guo M (2024) The impact of peer effect of industrial robot application on enterprise carbon emission reduction. Sci Rep 14: 12070.
- Katariya M, Mathur A, Singh S (2025) Human-Robot/Machine Interaction for Sustainable Manufacturing: Industry 5.0 Perspectives. In Handbook of Intelligent and Sustainable Manufacturing pp. 18-41.
- Dahlin E (2019) Are Robots Stealing Our Jobs? Socius, 5.
- Klenert D, Fernández-Macías, E, Antón JI (2023) Do robots really destroy jobs? Evidence from Europe. Economic and Industrial Democracy 44(1): 280-316.
-
Cyryl Garus*. Opportunities For Greener Production Through Robotics Systems in Green Factories. On Journ of Robotics & Page 3 of 4 Autom. 3(2): 2024. OJRAT.MS.ID.000558.
Green Factories; Robots; Cobots; Carbon Footprint; Emission; Fossil Fuels; Ecological Sustainability; Recycling Operations; Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Precision, Efficiency, and Collaborative Robotics (Cobotics)
- Energy Conservation and Green New Work
- Flexibilization of the workplace and ecological benefits
- Waste reduction, circular economy, and cobotic synergy
- Reduction of Harmful Emissions
- Challenges and Considerations
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
- Conflict of Interest
- References