Open Access Case Report

Clinical Case of Simultaneous Coronary and Neuro Intervention in A Patient with Multifocal Lesions

Kolisnik V*, Peleshenko A, Goriachyi A and Brovarskaya O

Department of interventional cardiology and neuroradiology, Odessa Regional Hospital, Ukraine

Corresponding Author

Received Date: April 17, 2023;  Published Date: June 05, 2023

Multifocal atherosclerotic disease is most severe of cardiovascular pathology, which associated with significantly higher rate of MACCE, mortality, rehospitalization that requires multidisciplinary approach, multimodality imaging, complex treatment algorithm. Both, endovascular procedure and optimal medical therapy are used for each CAD and CVD. A hybrid simultaneous interventional procedure with using new antithrombotic agent may become a solution for improvement of outcomes in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and TIA/Stroke.


This presentation emphasizes the depth of multifocal atherosclerosis, its simultaneous presentation, and possible combined surgical treatment. We describe a clinical case of a 67-year-old male with severe cardiac and cerebral symptoms and multiple comorbidities. He underwent a hybrid interventional procedure performed jointly by the cardiac and interventional teams [1-4].

Case Presentation


A 67-year-old male with history of multiple illness including: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, mild renal impairment, coronary artery disease. Patient was hospitalized to ED with recurrent transit ischemic attacks (TIAs) combining with NSTEMIMI. At the time of the examination, the patient complained of diffuse headache, marked general weakness, increased blood pressure up to 190/120 mmHg, weakness in the left side extremities and numbness of the tongue, recurrent chest pain. The patient had episodes of unconsciousness twice at home without seizures. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showed ST segment depression in V2 – V6 leads. Transthoracic echocardiogram was performed, which showed preserved cardiac function (EF – 50%), with aortic sclerosis, anterior LV wall hypokinesis (mostly interventricular septal segments) [5,6]. Hb -112 g/l, creatinine – 1.28mg/dL, Troponin 1.8ng/ml. Cerebral CT demonstrated severe kinking C1 and critical stenosis of the Right ICA and MCA (Figure 1).

To clarify the cardiac and neurologic diagnosis a coronary and cerebral angiogram was planned. Selective carotid/cerebral angiography showed right internal carotid artery stenosis C2 segment 70-75%, and intracranial Right MCA in the M1 segment has critical stenosis of 95-99% blood flow TIСI 1-2 (Figure 2).To clarify the cardiac and neurologic diagnosis a coronary and cerebral angiogram was planned. Selective carotid/cerebral angiography showed right internal carotid artery stenosis C2 segment 70-75%, and intracranial Right MCA in the M1 segment has critical stenosis of 95-99% blood flow TIСI 1-2 (Figure 2).

To clarify the cardiac and neurologic diagnosis a coronary and cerebral angiogram was planned. Selective carotid/cerebral angiography showed right internal carotid artery stenosis C2 segment 70-75%, and intracranial Right MCA in the M1 segment has critical stenosis of 95-99% blood flow TIСI 1-2 (Figure 2).


Coronary angiography showed critical narrowing along the anterior interventricular branch of the left coronary artery 90% in the proximal segment, 75-80% in the middle segment and 70-80% in the marginal branch (Figure 3).


The simultaneous endovascular procedure was performed. Transfemoral approach, anesthesia – local+ sedation, antithrombotic agent – Cangrelol 30mcg/kg bolus and followed by a 4mcg/kg/ min infusion via IV line. The first stage was neurointervention: 1) Angioplasty M1 segment right MCA with thromboaspiration technique 2) Angioplasty stenosis C2 segment ICA . A Neuromax 6F guiding catheter was placed in the distal right common carotid artery [7]. A pressurized flushing system was set up. A Distal access catheter Sophia 5F with coaxial system neurowire Traxess 0.014 +and Neurospeed 2.5x 8 mm intracranial balloon (3 -4 atm) were used. The ballon inflation lasted 10 sec with next following aspiration via Penumbra System. After that, balloon angioplasty was performed in C2 segment ICA using Neurospeed 2.5x 8 mm (8 -10 atm) intracranial balloon. Control angiography was performed with result TICI 3 (Figure 4).


The second stage was coronary artery stenting. A guidewire system was inserted into the left coronary artery. Predilatation with a 2.5 x 15 mm balloon was performed (p 11-12 atm) in the proximal LAD [8]. DES Resolute Integrity 2.75 x 14 mm (p11 -12 atm) was implanted. Control angiography was performed with a positive angiographic result TIMI3 (Figure 5).


The closer device AngioSeal. Duration of procedure 85min, contrast – 210ml. There were not any complication. Optimal medical therapy: Ticagrelor 90mg x twice per day, Aspirin 75mg, Rosuvastatin 20mg. Patient discharged on the fourth day [9].


Angiography and stenting of carotid and coronary arteries are becoming part of routine interventional practice and are widely performed by appropriately trained and qualified specialists. Each procedure has its own indications and contraindications, its own risks, its own techniques, and areas of application. It requires appropriate knowledge and experience and specialized medical instruments. In clinical practice, we are often confronted with these procedures being performed separately, sometimes even at different time intervals. This leads to a loss of precious time for the patient [10,11].

Of course, there are reasons and indications for this too. However, after carefully weighing and weighing up the risks and benefits, we are more inclined toward the simultaneous performance of such interventions. Firstly, the X-ray burden on the staff and the patient is significantly reduced. Repeated interventions always exponentially increase the risk of infection and septic complications. Most importantly, the patient receives all necessary care at once, without losing any time. This significantly increases the chances of subsequent recovery. This reduces the length of hospital stay and the overall financial burden on the healthcare system as a whole [12-15].


We present this case to raise awareness of the extent of atherosclerosis and the possibility of combined surgery. To date, many authors have presented similar data. We, in turn, once again want to emphasize the possibility of such interventions.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.


  1. J S Yadav, G S Roubin, S Iyer, J Vitek, P King, et al. (1997) Elective stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries. Circulation 95(2): 376-381.
  2. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS, Vitek JJ, Al-Mubarak N, et al. (2001) Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 103(4): 532-537.
  3. Morey SS (1998) AHA updates guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. Am Fam Physician 58(8): 1903-1904.
  4. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60(2): 259-266.
  5. Al-Mubarak N, Liu MW, Dean LS (1999) Incidences and outcomes of prolonged hypoten.
  6. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, et al. (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355(16): 1660-1671.
  7. Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Bruckmann H, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G, et al. (2006) 30-day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368(9543): 1239-1247.
  8. Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Manetti R, de Donato G, Setacci F, et al. (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stenting: lesion related treatment strategies. EuroIntervention 1(3): 289-295.
  9. Gilutz H, Shindel S, Shoham-Vardi I (2019) Adherence to NSTEMI Guidelines in the Emergency Department: Regression to Reality. Crit Pathw Cardiol 18(1): 40-46.
  10. Piątek Ł, Wilczek K, Janion-Sadowska A, Gierlotka M, Gąsior M, et al. (2019) Outcomes of a routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 2005 to 2014: results from the PL-ACS registry. Coron Artery Dis 30(5): 326-331.
  11. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 36(3): 959-969.
  12. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, et al. (2019) ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 40(3): 237-269.
  13. Wilson PW (1994) Established risk factors and coronary artery disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Hypertens. 7(7 Pt 2): 7S-12S.
  14. Canto JG, Kiefe CI, Rogers WJ, Peterson ED, Frederick PD, et al. (2011) Number of coronary heart disease risk factors and mortality in patients with first myocardial infarction. JAMA 306(19): 2120-2127.
  15. Hartikainen TS, Sörensen NA, Haller PM, Goßling A, Lehmacher J, et al. (2020) Clinical application of the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J 41(23): 2209-2216.
Signup for Newsletter
Scroll to Top