Harnessing Biominerals for Next-Generation Regenerative Medicine: Bioinspired Strategies and Technological Frontiers

Biominerals are remarkable composite materials formed by living organisms through the process of biomineralization, where inorganic elements from the environment are integrated into organic structures to create essential biological materials [1]. These biominerals, which include carbonates, phosphates, silicates, and organic crystals, serve a wide range of critical functions, such as providing structural support, offering protection, and facilitating ion storage [2]. Over 60 types of biominerals have been identified, each exhibiting unique mechanical and functional properties that often surpass those of their synthetically produced counterparts [3]. For example, calcium carbonates are fundamental to the skeletal structures of invertebrates like mollusks and echinoderms, while hydroxyapatite (HAP) is a key component in the bones and teeth of vertebrates [4]. Silica, another prominent biomineral, is widely found in protists, plants, and animals, where it contributes to structural integrity and environmental adaptation [5]. Understanding the mechanisms of biomineralization not only provides insights into biological processes but also inspires the development of advanced biomaterials with enhanced mechanical and multifunctional properties.

The natural formation of biominerals is a complex and highly regulated process influenced by both biological and environmental factors [6]. For instance, calcium carbonate, one of the most studied biominerals, exists in three primary polymorphs—calcite, aragonite, and vaterite—with calcite and aragonite being the most prevalent in biological systems [7]. The stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC), a precursor phase, is a critical step in the mineralization process, often facilitated by acidic polypeptides and proteins [8]. Similarly, the formation of hydroxyapatite in vertebrate bones involves a sophisticated interplay between collagen and Non-Collagenous Proteins (NCPs), which guide the nucleation and growth of HAP crystals within the collagen matrix [9]. Silica deposition in organisms like diatoms and sponges is another fascinating example, where specialized proteins such as silaffins and silicatein-α play pivotal roles in controlling silica polymerization and structure formation [10]. These natural processes underscore the intricate balance between organic and inorganic components in biomineralization, offering valuable insights for the design of synthetic biomaterials with tailored properties [11].

In the field of regenerative medicine, biominerals have emerged as indispensable materials for bone and tissue repair due to their biocompatibility, bioactivity, and ability to promote cell differentiation [12]. Hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonates, and silicabased materials are widely used in scaffolds and drug delivery systems, providing essential ions like calcium, phosphate, and silicon that are crucial for tissue regeneration [13]. For example, Bioactive Glass (BG), composed of silica, calcium, and phosphate, has been extensively utilized in bone repair due to its ability to release beneficial ions and form a bonding layer with natural bone [14]. Similarly, silica-based materials are employed in scaffolds and drug delivery systems, leveraging their ability to inhibit inflammation and promote cell growth [15]. The design of biomimetic scaffolds that replicate the hierarchical structures of natural biominerals has opened new avenues in tissue engineering, enabling the creation of materials that closely resemble the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) and support tissue regeneration [16]. These advancements highlight the potential of biominerals in addressing the complex demands of regenerative medicine.

Despite their promise, the application of biomineral-based composites in regenerative medicine faces several challenges [17]. Achieving the optimal balance of mechanical properties, such as strength, flexibility, and load-bearing capacity, remains a significant hurdle, as these properties are influenced by factors like material choice, fabrication processes, and microstructure. Biocompatibility and biodegradability are also critical considerations, as these materials must integrate seamlessly with biological systems without eliciting adverse immune responses and degrade at a rate that matches tissue regeneration [18]. Additionally, the fabrication of biomineral composites often involves intricate and time-consuming processes, which can hinder scalability and reproducibility [19]. Environmental sustainability and regulatory compliance further complicate their widespread adoption [20]. However, future research is poised to overcome these challenges through the integration of advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and 3D printing [21]. These tools enable the design and fabrication of complex, hierarchical structures that mimic natural biominerals, paving the way for next-generation biomaterials with transformative applications in regenerative medicine [22].

Biominerals are composite materials produced by living organisms through the process of biomineralization, where elements from the environment are incorporated to create essential structures [23]. These materials, which include carbonates, phosphates, silicates, and organic crystals, serve critical functions such as structural support, protection, and ion storage. Over 60 types of biominerals have been identified, each exhibiting superior mechanical and functional properties compared to their abiotically formed counterparts [24]. For instance, calcium carbonates are fundamental in the skeletal structures of invertebrates like mollusks and echinoderms, while hydroxyapatite (HAP) is a key component in vertebrate bones and teeth. Silica, on the other hand, is widely found in protists, plants, and animals, playing a vital role in structural integrity and environmental adaptation [25]. Understanding the mechanisms of biomineralization not only sheds light on biological processes but also inspires the development of advanced biomaterials with enhanced mechanical and multifunctional properties. The natural formation of biominerals is a complex process influenced by both biological and environmental factors [26]. Calcium carbonate, for example, exists in three primary polymorphs—calcite, aragonite, and vaterite—with calcite and aragonite being the most prevalent in biological systems [27].

The stabilization of Amorphous Calcium Carbonate (ACC) is a crucial step in the mineralization process, often facilitated by acidic polypeptides and proteins [28]. Similarly, hydroxyapatite formation in bones involves the interplay of collagen and Non- Collagenous Proteins (NCPs), which guide the nucleation and growth of HAP crystals within the collagen matrix [29]. Silica deposition in diatoms and sponges is another fascinating example, where proteins like silaffins and silicatein-α play pivotal roles in controlling silica polymerization and structure formation [30]. These natural processes highlight the intricate balance between organic and inorganic components in biomineralization, offering valuable insights for designing synthetic biomaterials.

Biominerals play a significant role in regenerative medicine, particularly in the development of biomaterials for bone and tissue repair (Figure 1). Hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonates, and silicabased materials are widely used due to their biocompatibility, bioactivity, and ability to promote cell differentiation [31]. These minerals provide essential ions like calcium, phosphate, and silicon, which are crucial for tissue regeneration [32 & 33]. For instance, bioactive glass (BG), composed of silica, calcium, and phosphate, has been extensively used in bone repair due to its ability to release beneficial ions and form a bonding layer with natural bone [34]. Similarly, silica-based materials are employed in drug delivery systems and scaffolds, leveraging their ability to inhibit inflammation and promote cell growth [35]. The design of biomimetic scaffolds that mimic the hierarchical structures of natural biominerals has opened new avenues for tissue engineering, enabling the creation of materials that closely resemble the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) and support tissue regeneration [17].

In composite materials, biominerals enhance mechanical properties and biocompatibility, making them ideal for regenerative medicine applications [36]. By mimicking the nano structuring and organic-inorganic interactions found in natural biominerals, researchers have developed composites with superior strength, toughness, and biodegradability [21]. For example, Cellulose Nanofibers (CNFs) stabilized with Amorphous Calcium Carbonate (ACC) have demonstrated exceptional mechanical properties, surpassing traditional synthetic composites [37]. Additionally, bioinspired porous architectures, such as those found in trabecular bone and diatom skeletons, have been incorporated into composite designs to improve stress distribution and energy dissipation [19]. These advancements, coupled with additive manufacturing techniques like 3D printing, have enabled the creation of complex, hierarchical structures that combine low weight with high mechanical strength [38]. Despite challenges related to production complexity and long-term behavior, biomineral-based composites hold immense potential for addressing the intricate demands of tissue regeneration and repair.

The application of biomineral-based composites in regenerative medicine holds immense promise, but it is not without significant challenges [39]. One of the primary hurdles is achieving the optimal balance of mechanical properties, such as strength, flexibility, and load-bearing capacity, which are critical for their performance in tissue regeneration [40]. The mechanical behavior of these composites is influenced by factors like material choice, fabrication processes, and microstructure, making it difficult to replicate the hierarchical structures found in natural tissues [41]. Additionally, biocompatibility remains a major concern, as these materials must not elicit adverse immune responses while promoting tissue integration [42]. Biodegradability is another critical factor, as the composite must degrade at a rate that matches tissue regeneration, releasing beneficial ions or drugs to aid healing [43]. However, controlling degradation rates and ensuring consistent quality during mass production are complex tasks. Furthermore, the fabrication of biomineral composites often involves intricate and time-consuming processes, which can hinder scalability and reproducibility [44].

Environmental sustainability and regulatory compliance also pose challenges, as these materials must be both eco-friendly and meet stringent safety standards for clinical use [45]. Addressing these issues requires interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative approaches to material design and manufacturing.

Future research in biomineral-based composites is poised to leverage advanced technologies and bio-inspired strategies to overcome current limitations [46]. Bio-inspired mineralization methods, which mimic natural processes, offer a sustainable and efficient way to create composites with superior mechanical properties and biocompatibility [47]. These methods operate under mild conditions, reducing energy consumption and minimizing byproducts, making them environmentally friendly [48]. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are emerging as powerful tools to optimize material design and manufacturing processes. AI-driven approaches can accelerate the discovery of high-performing materials and enable the creation of complex, hierarchical structures that mimic natural Biominerals [49]. For instance, reinforcement learning and multi-objective optimization have been used to design bio-inspired composites with tailored mechanical properties [50].

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, particularly digital light processing (DLP), are revolutionizing the fabrication of biomineral composites by enabling the production of intricate, high-resolution structures at scale [33]. These advancements facilitate precise control over mineral distribution and scaffold architecture, enhancing their functionality in tissue regeneration. However, challenges such as achieving high precision, resolving material inhomogeneities, and optimizing manufacturing conditions remain [41]. Addressing these issues through continued innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration will pave the way for the development of next-generation biomineral composites with transformative applications in regenerative medicine.

Biominerals, formed through the intricate process of biomineralization, play a crucial role in providing structural support, protection, and ion storage in biological systems. Their naturally optimized mechanical properties have inspired the development of synthetic biomaterials for regenerative medicine, particularly in bone and tissue engineering. Materials like hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonates, and silica-based composites exhibit excellent biocompatibility and bioactivity, making them ideal candidates for scaffolds and drug delivery systems. Additionally, biomimetic approaches have enhanced the design of these materials, improving their integration with biological tissues. However, several challenges persist, including achieving an optimal balance of mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Fabrication complexities, scalability limitations, and regulatory requirements further hinder their widespread application and clinical adoption.

To overcome these challenges, future research must harness cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and 3D printing to refine material properties and streamline production processes. AI-driven models can accelerate the discovery of high-performance biomineral composites, while bio-inspired mineralization techniques can enhance their mechanical and functional attributes. Furthermore, 3D printing allows precise control over scaffold architecture, improving structural integrity and performance. Collaboration between materials scientists, biotechnologists, and biomedical engineers will be essential in advancing these materials for medical applications. By addressing current limitations, biomineral-based composites have the potential to revolutionize regenerative medicine, offering innovative and sustainable solutions for tissue engineering, drug delivery, and biomedical research.

The author declares no competing interests related to this study.

The author expresses sincere gratitude to the Capital University of Science & Technology (CUST), Islamabad, Pakistan, for providing the necessary resources and support for this research. Special appreciation is extended to mentors and colleagues for their valuable guidance and insightful discussions that contributed to the development of this work..

1. Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 32(8): 762-798.
2. Kango S, Kalia S, Celli A, Njuguna J, Habibi Y, et al. (2013) Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic-inorganic nanocomposites—A review. Prog Polym Sci 38(8): 1232-1261.
3. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR (2006) Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27: 3413-3431.
4. Engel E, Michiardi A, Navarro M, Lacroix D, Planell JA (2008) Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: The materials side. Trends Biotechnol. 26: 39-47.
5. Addadi L, Weiner S (2014) Biomineralization: Mineral formation by organisms. Phys Scr. 89: 098003.
6. Hardy JG, Torres-Rendon JG, Leal-Egana A, Walther A, Schlaad H, et al. (2016) Biomineralization of engineered spider silk protein-based composite materials for bone tissue engineering. Materials 9: 560.
7. Upadhyay RK (2017) Role of calcium bio-minerals in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. J Stem Cell Res Ther 2: 166-175.
8. Haftek M, Abdayem R, Guyonnet-Debersac P (2022) Skin minerals: Key roles of inorganic elements in skin physiological functions. Int J Mol Sci 23: 6267.
9. Su Y, Cappock M, Dobres S, Kucine AJ, Waltzer WC (2023) Supplemental mineral ions for bone regeneration and osteoporosis treatment. Eng Regen. 4: 170-182.
10. Luz GM, Mano JF (2010) Mineralized structures in nature: Examples and inspirations for the design of new composite materials and biomaterials. Compos Sci Technol 70: 1777-1788.
11. Wang W, Liu X, Zheng X, Jin HJ, Li X (2020) Biomineralization: An opportunity and challenge of nanoparticle drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 9: 2001117.
12. Jantschke A (2022) Non-silicate minerals (carbonates, oxides, phosphates, sulfur-containing, oxalates, and other organic crystals) induced by microorganisms. In: Berenjian A, Seifan M, editors. Mineral Formation by Microorganisms. Cham, Switzerland: Springer 36: 161-241.
13. Deng Z, Jia Z, Li L (2022) Biomineralized materials as model systems for structural composites: Intracrystalline structural features and their strengthening and toughening mechanisms. Adv Sci.9: 210-3524.
14. Zimmermann EA, Ritchie RO (2015) Bone as a structural material. Adv Healthc Mater. 4: 1287-1304.
15. Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, et al. (2019) The hidden structure of human enamel. Nat Commun. 10: 4383.
16. Perry CC (2009) An overview of silica in biology: Its chemistry and recent technological advances. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 47: 295-313.
17. Evans JS (2008) “Tuning in” to mollusk shell nacre- and prismatic-associated protein terminal sequences. Implications for biomineralization and the construction of high-performance inorganic-organic composites. Chem Rev. 108: 4455-4462.
18. Guo Y, Wang F, Zhang J, Yang L, Shi X, et al. (2012) Biomimetic synthesis of calcium carbonate with different morphologies under the direction of different amino acids. Res Chem Intermed. 39: 2407-2415.
19. Niu YQ, Liu JH, Aymonier C, Fermani S, Kralj D, et al. (2022) Calcium carbonate: Controlled synthesis, surface functionalization, and nanostructured materials. Chem Soc Rev. 51: 7883-7943.
20. Wallace AK, Chanut N, Voigt CA (2020) Silica nanostructures produced using diatom peptides with designed post-translational modifications. Adv Funct Mater, 30: 2000849.
21. Mi-Ran Ki, Sung Ho Kim, Tae In Park, Seung Pil Pack (2023) Self-entrapment of antimicrobial peptides in silica particles for stable and effective antimicrobial peptide delivery system. Int J Mol Sci 24(22): 16423.
22. Sherif Elsharkawy, Maisoon Al-Jawad, Maria F Pantano, Esther Tejeda-Montes, Khushbu Mehta, et al. (2018) Protein disorder-order interplay to guide the growth of hierarchical mineralized structures. Nat Commun 9(1): 2145.
23. Olszta MJ, Cheng X, Jee SS, Kumar R, Kim YY, et al. (2007) Bone structure and formation: A new perspective. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 58(3-5): 77-116.
24. Yang W, Meyers MA, Ritchie RO (2019) Structural architectures with toughening mechanisms in nature: A review of the materials science of type-I collagenous materials. Prog Mater Sci 103: 425-483.
25. Arun K Nair, Alfonso Gautieri, Shu-Wei Chang, Markus J Buehler (2013) Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat Commun 4: 1724.
26. Moataz El Gezawi, Uta Christine Wölfle, Rasha Haridy, Riham Fliefel, Dalia Kaisarly (2019) Remineralization, regeneration, and repair of natural tooth structure: Influences on the future of restorative dentistry practice. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5(10): 4899-4919.
27. Li-Na Niu, Wei Zhang, David H Pashley, Lorenzo Breschi, Jing Mao, et al. (2014) Biomimetic remineralization of dentin. Dent Mater 30(1): 77-96.
28. Monica Prasad, William T Butler, Chunlin Qin (2010) Dentin sialophosphoprotein in biomineralization. Connect Tissue Res 51(5): 404-417.
29. HongJun Wang, Sissada Tannukit, DanHong Zhu, Malcolm L Snead, Michael L Paine (2005) Enamel matrix protein interactions. J Bone Miner Res 20(6): 1032-1040.
30. Vaibhav Sharma, Alagiri Srinivasan, Fredrik Nikolajeff , Saroj Kumar (2021) Biomineralization process in hard tissues: The interaction complexity within protein and inorganic counterparts. Acta Biomater 120: 20-37.
31. Yushi Bai, Zanlin Yu, Larry Ackerman, Yan Zhang, Johan Bonde, et al. (2020) Protein nanoribbons template enamel mineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(32): 19201-19208.
32. Ana Gil-Bona, Felicitas B Bidlack (2020) Tooth enamel and its dynamic protein matrix. Int J Mol Sci 21(12): 4458.
33. Saumya Prajapati, Jinhui Tao, Qichao Ruan, James J De Yoreo, Janet Moradian-Oldak (2016) Matrix metalloproteinase-20 mediates dental enamel biomineralization by preventing protein occlusion inside apatite crystals. Biomaterials 75: 260-270.
34. Yanyan Zhou, Zihe Hu, Mingjie Ge, Wenjing Jin, Ruikang Tang, et al. (2021) Intraosseous injection of calcium phosphate polymer-induced liquid precursor increases bone density and improves early implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. Int J Nanomed 16: 6217-6229.
35. Kassidy Patoine, Kristy Ta, Amanda Gilbert, Marielle Percuoco, Aren E Gerdon (2024) Equilibrium interactions of biomimetic DNA aptamers produce intrafibrillar calcium phosphate mineralization of collagen. Acta Biomater 179: 234-242.
36. Kröger N (2022) Biomolecules involved in frustule biogenesis and function. In: The Molecular Life of Diatoms pp 313-343.
37. Hildebrand M, Lerch SJL, Shrestha RP (2018) Understanding diatom cell wall silicification—Moving forward. Front Mar Sci 5: 125.
38. Martin-Jézéquel V, Hildebrand M, Brzezinski MA (2003) Silicon metabolism in diatoms: Implications for growth. J Phycol 36(5): 821-840.
39. Kröger N, Deutzmann R, Sumper M (1999) Polycationic peptides from diatom biosilica that direct silica nanosphere formation. Science 286(5442): 1129-1132.
40. Kröger N, Deutzmann R, Bergsdorf C, Sumper M (2001) Species-specific polyamines from diatoms control silica morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(26): 14133-14138.
41. Alexander Kotzsch, Philip Gröger, Damian Pawolski, Paul H H Bomans, Nico A J M Sommerdijk, et al. (2017) Silicanin-1 is a conserved diatom membrane protein involved in silica biomineralization. BMC Biol 15(1): 65.
42. K Shimizu, J Cha, G D Stucky, D E Morse (1998) Silicatein alpha: Cathepsin L-like protein in sponge biosilica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(11): 6234-6238.
43. Katsuhiko Shimizu, Daniel E Morse (2018) Silicatein: A unique silica-synthesizing catalytic triad hydrolase from marine sponge skeletons and its multiple applications. Methods Enzymol 605: 429-455.
44. Ute Schlossmacher, Matthias Wiens, Heinz C Schröder, Xiaohong Wang, Klaus P Jochum (2011) Silintaphin-1—interaction with silicatein during structure-guiding bio-silica formation. FEBS J 278(7): 1145-1155.
45. ElBatal HA, Azooz MA, Khalil EMA, Monem AS, Hamdy YM (2003) Characterization of some bioglass-ceramics. Mater Chem Phys 80(3): 599-609.
46. Dorozhkin SV, Epple M (2002) Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew Chem Int Ed 41(17): 3130-3146.
47. Suzuki O (2010) Octacalcium phosphate: Osteoconductivity and crystal chemistry. Acta Biomater 6(9): 3379-3387.
48. Sheikh Z, Abdallah MN, Hanafi AA, Misbahuddin S, Rashid H, et al. (2015) Mechanisms of in vivo degradation and resorption of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials. Materials (Basel) 8(11): 7913-7925.
49. Wang X, Zhao P, Tong Y, Guo S, Zhao G, et al. (2022) Photolithographic high-conductivity transparent conformal rGO/PEDOT:PSS electrodes for flexible skin-like all solution-processed organic transistors. Adv Mater Technol 7(12): 202200660.
50. Neda Saffarian Tousi, Megen F Velten, Timothy J Bishop, Kelly K Leong, Nicole S Barkhordar, et al. (2013) Combinatorial effect of Si⁴⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ released from bioactive glasses on osteoblast osteocalcin expression and biomineralization. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33(5): 2757-2765.