Open Access Research Article

Perceived Risk in Cloud Computing Technology Adoption in Small and Medium-Sized Accounting Firms

Jacqueline T Jamsheed*

Department of Accounting, Elms College, USA

Zora P deRham

Corresponding Author

Received Date: September 05, 2023;  Published Date: September 20, 2023

Abstract

This study uses data from an online survey of 116 small-and medium-sized (SME) accounting firm leaders to research perceptions of cloud computing technology adoption to meet staff demands for a remote work environment and customer requirements for digital service offerings post-COVID-19 pandemic. The perceived risk impacting cloud adoption decisions were studied using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance model (TAM) as the scaffolding for the research model. The analysis was conducted using partial least squares (PLS). The findings indicate that leaders have significantly favorable views towards the adoption of cloud technology. Moreover, the research finds, through the unsupported hypotheses of risk perception, that firm leadership does not find the risk of cloud adoption a barrier to their consideration of technology. The study illustrates how SME accounting firm leadership views the adoption of cloud-enabled technologies to meet their evolving business needs, while illuminating attitudinal and intentional factors impacting technology adoption. Based on the literature review and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the only published research focusing on SME accounting firm leadership perceptions surrounding the risks associated with cloud technology adoption resulting from the post-pandemic business changes.

Keywords: Cloud technology; Small and medium-sized accounting firms; Small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs); Risk, Risk Perception; Technology Acceptance Model; Theory of Planned Behavior

Introduction

One impact of the post-COVID-19 pandemic business environment is the desire of employees, customers, and supply chains to reimagine the concept of work and the interactions that their work entails [1-4]. This reimagined landscape includes consideration of cloud enabled technologies; Large enterprises estimate that approximately 60% of their environments will be migrating in the cloud by 2025, generating $3 trillion in EBITDA value by 2030 [5]. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must also reimagine work and are faced with an unprecedented push towards the adoption of cloud-supported technologies in support of a workforce and client base wanting to maintain many practices and processes surrounding their remote interactions, as adopted at the height of the pandemic [6-10]. In the current environment, a key to sustainable growth and continued relevance for many SMEs is the consideration of cloud enabled technologies [11]. Cloud technologies are also affordable and easy to use, making their adoption attractive to SMEs [12].

This research attempts to understand how small and mediumsized regional and local accounting firm decision-makers perceive the risks associated with cloud computing technology adoption in the context of theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance model (TAM). Evidence was gathered via an online survey of 116 leaders representing accounting firms from various geographical locations. The analysis was conducted using partial least squares (PLS). This study aims to enrich the business and academic community’s knowledge of the enticements and barriers to technology adoption in small-and medium-sized accounting firms responding to a changing work landscape.

The results indicate that SME accounting firm leadership does not find the risk of cloud adoption a barrier to their consideration of cloud-enabled technologies due to the potential increase in job performance and productivity. The survey results also indicated a positive attitude towards the use of cloud technology owing to its perceived ease of use and usefulness. The leadership in our study also felt that they had sufficient knowledge, understanding, and support to adopt cloud technology if they decided to do so. This study on the perceived risks of cloud technology adoption was based leadership’s intention to adopt, perceptions of ease of use and overall usefulness grounded in the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model.

This study makes many academic and practical contributions to literature. Based on the literature review and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the only published research focusing on SME accounting firm leadership perceptions surrounding the risks associated with cloud technology adoption as a result of the business changes brought about by the postpandemic world order. In addition, this study adds to the literature on the factors affecting smaller accounting firms’ technology adoption. Theoretically, this study builds on past research surrounding technology risk perception, the predictive power of technology acceptance and theory of planned behavior models by introducing a new setting of accounting SME leadership views on cloud technology adoption. Practically speaking, this study provides insights into the thinking and considerations of SME accounting firm leadership when making technology acquisition decisions.

Background and Theory

Cloud adoption advantages and disadvantages

Cloud computing technology, as defined in this research, refers to general internet-based computing services rather than to a particular type of characteristic (e.g., on demand, resource pooled), model (e.g., public, private, hybrid or community), or category (e.g., SaaS, PaaS, IaaS) [13,14]. Cloud computing embodies the convergence of two major trends in information technology: efficiency and business agility, [15] which can present advantages and disadvantages to businesses that employ this technology. Advantages include cost savings/efficiency, continuous availability, reliability, agility, scalability/flexibility/elasticity, quick deployment with ease of integration, increased storage capacity, outsourced maintenance, minimized new software licensing, innovation, simultaneous user access, and environmentally friendly solutions [16-25]. Disadvantages include lack of user control due to the outsourced nature of the product, network dependency due to 100% internet usage, risk/exposure to cyber threats, concerns over third-party access to systems, and challenges linked to data and system migration [26,17,18,27,22,23].

Cloud adoption risk considerations and compensating controls

Cloud computing has attracted many as it facilitates collaborative remote work, virtual data sharing and anywhere data access. In reviewing the literature, the barriers to cloud adoption in the form of perceived risks, especially for SMEs, are high with these business continuity threats requiring consideration and attention. Some of the most cited perceived risks influencing a business’s decision on cloud adoption are: (1) network reliability/connectivity, (2) control over stored data, (3) security of stored data- where is it located and who has access to it, (4) overall cost- transition to the cloud and storage, (5) service provider ability, trustworthiness and support, (6) data back-up frequency, completeness and deletion, and (7) overall technical savvy and understanding of internal staff [28-34]. The risks surrounding compatibility with current systems, data leakage/loss during transfers, infrastructure support, and network breaks are additional systematic risks requiring attention once a move to that cloud has occurred [35-37]. An overarching factor influencing user trust placed in cloud service providers is the understandability and transparency in which policies surrounding the securing of user data and the management of data access are outlined [38].

Within the accounting community the risks associated with information system adoption are outlined citing five trust service categories (security, availably, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy) that must be considered and addressed in each engagement (AICPA, 2022). Building on the work of the AICPA under the framework of cloud technology utilization, trust within the areas of authorization, authentication, and access management was identified as a key consumer concern [39]. Trust is seen as a crucial factor in the adoption of any technology influencing the perceived risks associated with technology acceptance and the speed at which adoption occurs [40-42]. Initial trust can also be established based on the service level agreements (SLA) provided by the cloud service provider and how these contractual agreements provide required assurances [43].

Organizations of all sizes are now realizing that cloud computing risks can at times elude governance considerations, such as internal controls assessments, as these external service providers are not considered part of the enterprise risk management and monitoring framework in addition to overstated entity reliance on vendor controls (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission [44,45]. Increasing controls coverage designed to reduce perceived risks and increase trust surrounding the use of cloud computing in the accounting community can be achieved through improved governance with expanded general controls audit procedures covering all cloud services in their entirety, moving beyond the physical realm [46]. As SMEs are increasingly moving data to the cloud, the importance of security preparedness in the form of access controls, password management, two factor authentication and data encryption along with a detailed understanding of service providers terms of service are essential factors in protecting data and securing business survival [47]. Businesses of all sizes must also be vigilant against threats posed by employee actions, both those of the cloud provider and the company itself and ensure that there are processes in place to trace and track malicious employee behavior [48]. Although the risks and threats associated with cloud adoption are plentiful, businesses believe that with proper mitigation the mission-critical nature of the technology supports adoption of this technology [49].

Theory

A theoretical approach based on and the construct of perceived risk [50], the concepts of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [51], and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) [52], have been utilized in this study to understand and explain the intention and behavior towards adoption of cloud technology by small and medium-sized accounting firms impacted by the global business changes of the COVID-19 pandemic. When looking at the intention to adopt a technology and concerns over risk, the perceived benefits are weighed against the perceived risks. Although cloud computing has been successful in attracting customers, it is still considered a risky technology among smaller businesses with a number of barriers hindering cloud computing adoption, such as lack of internal staff expertise, concern over data security, data migration interoperability, and lack of knowledge of the regulatory and service terms framework [36,53]. Concerns over the continuous availability of services via seamless connectivity, the transition of existing systems to the cloud, and data security [54] were also paramount concerns among smaller firms. Studies have found that privacy risk when considering the disclosure of personal information via the use of Internet platforms was outweighed by the benefits offered by the platform [55]. The influence of perceived usefulness mitigates perceived risk when considering mobile payments and internet banking [56]. The adoption of cloud technology found that perceived risk and subjective norms have a significant effect on trust intention vis-à-vis cloud adoption [57]. In the SME setting, cloud adoption-perceived risks were mainly those surrounding the reputational impact of data security breaches and denial of service issues [50].

TAM takes attributes from core technological variables (those pertaining to system usability) and psychological variables (those pertaining to users’ characteristics) to predict user acceptance of a technology [51]. As a social psychology theory, the TPB aims to explain human behavior and behavioral intentions across different situations. TPB also posits that behavioral intention is influenced by attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control factors over a given behavior [58]. Perceived risk is a multidimensional construct that studies the linkage between an individual’s perception of potential loss in pursuit of a desired outcome [59,60]. TAM indicates that perceived ease of use (PEOU), the extent to which an individual believes that using a particular system is free of effort, and perceived usefulness (PU), the extent to which an individual believes that using a particular system would improve work performance, [61] are both significant prognosticators of behavioral intention. Perceived usefulness has been proven to be a stronger predictor of behavioral intention than perceived ease of use [62]. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a significant positive relationship with the behavioral intention to use a technology [63], with recent research showing that the TAM is linked to positive attitudes towards using cloud computing services [64].

The predictive power of TPB stems from the belief that the stronger the intention to engage in a behavior, the more likely its performance is considering three conceptually independent determinants of intention: attitude towards the behavior (ATT), subjective norm (SN), and degree of perceived behavioral control (PBC) [52].

Research Model and Hypotheses

Research Model
irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

This research is an exploratory study of SME accounting firm leadership perceptions of cloud technology and their likelihood of leveraging this technology in daily operations. Utilizing past work on combining TAM and TPB, this study combined all five factors (usefulness, ease of use, attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control), as they were shown to have a significant impact on intention to utilize new technology [65]. Furthermore, the perceived risk of technology adoption [50] completes the model by acknowledging the fact that, even though consumers’ attitudes and intentions can drive technology decision-making, risk can still exert influence over decision-making processes and impact the weight placed on other factors, such as intention, attitude, or perceived control [57]. By considering the three factors (attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control) outlined by Ajzen [58] and the two factors (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) outlined by Davis, (1985) the current model has been constructed. Additionally, the perceived risk (Grant, Edgar, Sukumar, & Meyer, 2014) construct was added to this model, as shown in Figure 1.

Hypotheses

As seen in TAM, both PEOU and PU represent users’ cognitive responses to using a technology, which in turn influences a user’s attitude towards a given technology, impacting their intention to use [51, 66]. Attitude (ATT) is the level at which an individual favorably or unfavorably evaluates the behavior being studied [67,68]. The users’ affective response ultimately drives their behavioral response towards the technology with all things being equal; people form intentions to perform behaviors towards which they have positive effects [61]. It is believed that SME accounting firm leadership will be more open to utilizing cloud technology options to support both internal (staff collaboration and data analytics) and external (client interface and data management) activities if they find these options easy to use and useful for accomplishing personnel support and client acquisition/retention goals. Based on these views, the following hypotheses are proposed:

1. H1- Perceived ease of use (PEOU) positively impacts decision makers’ perceptions of the usefulness of cloud computing technology.

2. H2- Perceived ease of use (PEOU) positively impacts decision maker’s attitude towards cloud computing technology.

3. H3- Perceived usefulness (PU) positively impacts decision makers’ attitudes towards cloud computing technology.

4. H4- Positive attitude (ATT) towards cloud computing positively influences intention to adopt cloud computing technology.

The TPB [58], an extension of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980), appears to provide predictive guidance on individual attitudes towards performing a behavior via the impact of behavioral intentions and behavioral influencers. The constructs of subjective norms (SN) and perceived behavioral control (PBC) incorporate aspects of human behavior to ascertain intentions [69]. Perceived social pressure also impacts planned behavior, with a positive relationship between subjective norms and intention [70,66]. This study explores the linkages between subjective norms and perceived behavioral control in SME accounting firms’ leadership intentions towards adopting cloud technology. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the norms surrounding the use of cloud-supported technologies have shifted, and the following hypotheses are postulated:

1. H5- Subjective norms (SN) positively influences intention to adopt cloud computing technology.

2. H6: Perceived behavioral control (PBC) positively influences the decision maker’s intention to adopt cloud computing technology.

The effects of perceived risk on technology adoption decisions as they relate to the external factors of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness have been examined to determine the connection and direction of this connection. The study by [50] states that risk in the SME setting is a subjective factor that is impacted by many exterior influencers, such as industry, age of leadership, and staff technological savvy. Technology adoption is also influenced by leadership style, which is a high-touch client model in many SMEs, with these relationships being a part of their success formula [71,72]. Increased reliance on technology to support staff and client interactions could be viewed as risky by accounting SMEs; therefore, the following hypothesis is postulated:

1. H7- Perceived risk (R) negatively influences the decisionmaker’s intention to adopt cloud computing technology.

Materials and Methods

Sample and Procedure

The empirical section of this study was conducted using a questionnaire survey modifying the previously validated scales for perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, [61,73] attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, [52,70,68,74,65] perceived risk, [56] and intention to use [52]. The survey was sent to members of the BDO Seidman Alliance, a nationwide association of independently owned local and regional accounting, consulting, and service businesses across the United States, (BDO Alliance, n.d.) which comprises decision makers of small and medium-sized accounting firms. Based on the targeted nature of the underlying population in this study and the P-values, a usable questionnaire sample population of 116 was deemed acceptable [75,76]. The survey response rate was 16%, with a usable response rate of 14%, which was considered acceptable due to the high quality of respondents and the timing of the survey (COVID-19 generated business uncertainty and disruption), both being factors and key features in the study [77,78].

The respondents consisted of 69 percent males and 31 percent females. The majority of respondents were certified public accountants (78%). The ages of the respondents were evenly distributed, with the majority (34%) being between the ages of 51 and 60. The majority of respondents were either senior partners (28%) or owners (24%) of the accounting firm that they worked for. The largest number of respondents (32%) worked in firms with an employee count between 26 and 50. See Table 1 for additional details regarding the makeup and distribution of survey respondents.

Table 1:Summary Statistics of the Make-up and Distribution of Respondents.

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

Methodology

Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the hypotheses. In addition to accommodating smaller sample sizes, this methodology has two distinct advantages over ordinary least squares (OLS) regression [79-83]. First, PLS-SEM makes no assumptions regarding the distribution characteristics of the underlying variables. Second, OLS regression does not easily facilitate the inclusion of interaction terms in a model without orthogonality as a design condition. Finally, the majority of the literature discovered during research on the TPB and TAM frameworks revealed the extensive use of the PLS-SEM methodology. Thus, this author sought to preserve the comparability of the results from this study with those attained in prior research.

Results

Measurement Model

To ensure the reliability and validity of the constructs, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were measured using confirmatory factor analysis (factor loading), average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR). The measurement tool consists of seven items with a total of 26 factors, with all but one factor above the ideal cutoff criterion of 0.7 [84]. The one factor below 0.7 is at 0.673 which is very close to the 0.7 mark and seen in many studies as a factor loading that is acceptable [85-88], while some have considered factor loading cut-offs of 0.4 and above for their confirmatory factor analysis work [89]. The average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.588 to 0.933, all above the minimum limit of 0.5, to ensure convergent validity of the constructs [90]. Composite reliability (CR) considers indicators with different loadings and is a better indicator of internal consistency when using PLS [91]. CR (the degree to which the construct indicators expressed the latent construct) exceeded the recommended value of 0.7 [84]. The high alpha value was due to the earlier questions designed as part of the TPB and TAM studies.

Discriminant validity differentiates the measure of one construct from another and is seen by examining the correlation between the measures of potential overlapping constructs [90]. This model shows the differentiation in measurement of one construct to another, with all falling well below any overlap threshold and the constructs of intention and attitude, even though close, meeting the threshold requirements. According to Compeau, Higgins and Huff (1999), the average variance shared between each construct and its measure (diagonal values) should be greater than the variance shared between the constructs and other constructs; As seen in Table 2, this model meets these criteria.

Table 2:Overview of Findings Discriminant Validity Findings.

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

To provide additional discriminant validity detection, the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) was used, [92] as shown in Table 3. The resulting HTMT values in this study were below the 0.85 threshold [93,94].

Table 3:Overview of heterotrait-monotrait Ratio (HTMT) Findings.

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

Structural Model

Upon completion of the required measurement tests, the data were examined for model fit. To ensure that there were no multicollinearity issues among the independent factors (PEOU, PU, SN, PBC, PR) and the dependent factors (ATT and INT), variance inflation factors (VIF) were tested. As seen in Table 4, the lateral collinearity measured with the VIF values was under 3.3, indicating no potential collinearity problems [95]. In addition, the structural model is assessed by examining the R2, beta, and via bootstrapping reporting on the corresponding t-values [84].

Table 4:Overview of Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) Findings.

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

Hypothesis and Model Testing

In addition to confirming the relationships among the constructs, the relevance of significant relationships should be assessed via effect sizes (f2), predictive relevance (Q2), and significance (P Value). Effect size (f2) was used to assess the impact of a predictor construct on an endogenous construct. Predictive relevance or Stone-Geisser’s value (Q2) shows how well observed values are reconstructed by the model and its parameters. First, the relationships between the model variables are examined. Perceived ease of use positively impacted perceived usefulness (β = 0.671; p < 0.05) and attitude (β = 0.311, p < 0.05), while perceived usefulness positively impacted attitude (β = 0.492, p <0.05) and attitude positively affected intention (β = 0.560, p < 0.05), supporting Hypotheses H1, H2, H3 and H4. Subjective norm and perceived behavioral control positively affected intention (β = 0.234, p < 0.05) and (β = 0.251, p < 0.05), supporting Hypotheses H5 and H6. Perceived risk negatively impacted the intention to utilize cloud computing, and H7 was not supported (β = -0.047, p = 0.686). Perceived ease of use of cloud technology explains 45% (R2 = 0.450) of the variance in perceived usefulness, and perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use explain 54.4% (R2 = 0.544) of the variance in attitude. Attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and perceived risk explained 73.7% (R2 = 0.737) of the variance associated with the intention to utilize cloud technology (Table 5).

Table 5:Summary of Hypotheses Results.

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

Next, the effect size (f2) was examined. P value can indicate an effect; however, the p value does not reveal the size of the effect [96]. To understand the effect size, (f2) is considered. Based on the guidelines provided by Cohen (1988), the acceptable effect sizes of (f2) values are 0.35, 0.15, and 0.02, which are considered substantial, medium, and small, respectively. In this model, all relationships, with the exception of risk, had substantial or medium effect sizes. After viewing the R2 and f2 effect sizes, the predictive power of the model was examined using the predictive power-reuse technique (Q2) via the blindfolding procedure suggested by [97]. If the Q2 values are greater than 0, the model is assured to have predictive relevance (Figure 2), and all endogenous variables show acceptable predictive relevance [98].

irispublishers-openaccess-economics-and-business-management

Conclusion and Limitations

This study examines small-and medium-sized accounting leadership perspectives towards cloud-enabled computing technology adoption as a means of meeting customer requirements for digital service offerings and staff demands for a remote work environment in the face of changes post-pandemic. Even though risks are present when considering cloud adoption, perception of these risks was not found to be significant with attitudes and intentions being critical factors affecting the use and integration of cloud-enabled technologies. Leaders in small and medium-sized accounting businesses who have a positive attitude towards cloud technology and find these technologies useful tend to be more open to the adoption of cloud platforms. Based on a review of the literature, this study is the first to study the relationship between perceptions of risk and views on usefulness, ease of use, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, and attitude on the intention of leadership in small and medium-sized accounting firms to adopt cloud technology.

This research also adds to the body of knowledge surrounding SME adoption of cloud computing technologies by focusing on SME accounting firm leadership perspectives in a post-pandemic environment. SME accounting firms are influenced by their leadership; the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, which focus on individual factors in technology acceptance, were utilized. This study contributes to the literature by studying the interplay of risk perception with the predictive power of TAM and TPB models in the new setting of cloud adoption. The findings show that all the TAM variables (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) significantly influenced the intention to adopt cloud technology. These findings support the original TAM and the findings of other studies on technology adoption [99-101,62]. This study found that the TPB variables (attitude, subjective norm, and planned behavioral control) significantly influenced attitudes towards the adoption of cloud technology, which is supported by other studies on attitude [102,65]. The findings showed that perceived risk did not have a significant influence on the intention to adopt cloud technology. These findings run counter to studies indicating that perceived risk has a negative influence on the intention to adopt new technology [103,57,56]. The results show that when it comes to embracing the cloud in today’s environment, respondents are not concerned about the risks surrounding the adoption of this technology when considering the benefits.

Lastly, this study provides a methodological contribution to the body of knowledge by enhancing the existing risk perception, TAM and TPB scales to capture the impacts of cloud computing and by utilizing partial least squares-based structural equation modeling. Following the extensive literature on risk perception, TAM, and TPB scales, an updated measurement scale was developed, resulting in seven dimensions and 26 items, to capture the multifaceted perspectives on the adoption of cloud technology within the setting of small and medium-sized accounting firms. As cloud computing is becoming a key success factor in the accounting industry, acceptance among firms that this technology must be a part of their assurance business strategy moving forward [104]; Having a targeted measurement tool for use in future research can be beneficial. The use of a PLS approach adds to the body of work that supports the argument that this method of structural equation modeling can be used more often because of its ability to model latent variables using multiple regression in settings with small-tomedium sample sizes [91,84,105].

This study was conducted using a survey of small-and mediumsized accounting firm leadership when the business impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic became visible [106]. It should be noted that this study may not be applicable to all SMEs as the survey respondents and the overall scope of this work is limited to SME accounting firms [107]. Limitations of this work pertain to survey timing and provide opportunities for future research. As the immediate reverberations of the pandemic fade, a post-hoc study on the adoption of cloud-enabled technologies by smalland medium-sized accounting firms could be suitable [108,109]. Suggested topics for future research can focus on SME accounting firm leadership satisfaction with cloud technology choices in the post-pandemic era or leadership experience regarding employee satisfaction, firm productivity, and customer acceptance after moving to the cloud.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  • Krishnamurthy S (2020) The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research pp. 1-5.
  • Dingel JI, Neiman B (2020) How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Meyer BH, Prescott B, Sheng XS (2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on business expectations. International Journal of Forecasting pp. 1-16.
  • Price Waterhouse Cooper (2021) It’s time to reimagine where and how work will get done. Price Waterhouse Cooper.
  • McKinsey (2022) Projecting the global value of cloud: $3 trillion is up for grabs for companies that go beyond adoption. McKinsey Digital.
  • Lutfi M, Buntuang PC, Erdiyansyah YK, Hasanuddin B (2020) The impact of social distancing policy on small and medium-sized enterprises. Problems and Perspectives pp. 492-503.
  • Thorgren S, Williams TA (2020) Staying alive during an unfolding crisis- How SMEs ward off impending disaster. Journal of Business Venturing Insights pp. 1-11.
  • Adian I, Doumbia D, Gregory N, Ragoussis A, Reddy A, et al (2020) Small and Medium Enterprises in the Pandemic- Impact, Responses and the Role of Development Finance. Washington: World Bank Group.
  • George G, Lakhani KR, Puranam P (2020) What has changed? The Impact of Covid Pandemic on the Technology and Innovation Management Research Agenda. The Journal of Management Studies.
  • Lu Y, Wu J, Peng J, Lu L (2020) The perceived impact of the Covid-19 epidemic: evidence from a sample of 4807 SMEs in Sichuan Province. Environmental Hazards pp. 323-340.
  • Akpan IJ, Abasifreke E, Udoh P, Adebisi B (2022) Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship pp. 123-140.
  • Liu Y, Soroka A, Han L, Jian J, Tang M (2020) Cloud-based big data analytics for customer insight-driven design innovation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management pp. 1-14.
  • Modisane P, Jokonya O (2021) Evaluating the benefits of Cloud Computing in Small, Medium and Enterprises (SMMEs). Procedia Computer Science pp. 784-792.
  • Heidari A, Navimipour NJ (2022) Service discovery mechanisms in cloud computing: a comprehensive and systematic literature review. Kybernetes pp. 952-981.
  • Marston S, Bandyopadhyay S, Zhang J, Ghalsasi A (2011) Cloud computing — The business perspective. Decision Support Systems pp. 176-189.
  • Weinhardt C, Anandasivam WA, Blau B, Borissov N, Meinl T, et al. (2009) Cloud Computing a Classification Business Models and Research Directions. Business & Information Systems Engineering pp. 391-399.
  • Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, et al. (2010) A View of Cloud Computing. Communications of teh ACM pp. 50-58.
  • Christauskas C, Miseviciene R (2012) Cloud- Computing Based Accounting for Small to Medium Sized Businesses. Engineering Economics pp. 14-21.
  • Alshamaila Y, Papagiannidis S, Li F (2013) Cloud Computing Adoption by SMEs in the North East of England- A multi-perspective framework. Journal of Enterprise Information pp. 250-275.
  • Guptaa P, Seetharamana A, Rajb JR (2013) The usage and Adoption of Cloud Computing by Small and Medium Businesses. International Journal of Information Management pp. 861-874.
  • Conway G, Curry E, Donnellan B (2014) Cloud Computing Adoption: An SME Case Study. 17th Annual Irish Academy of Management Conference pp 1-8) Edward Curry.
  • Du H, Cong Y (2015) Going Cloud for Agility: Beyond Financial, System, and Control Motives. JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING pp. 153-167.
  • Mikkonen I, Khan I (2016) Cloud computing- SME company point of view. 8th International Research Conference Management Challenges in the 21st Century pp. 59-79. Bratislava.
  • Balachandran BM, Prasad S (2017) Challenges and Benefits of Deploying Big Data Analytics in the Cloud for Business Intelligence. Procedia Computer Science pp. 1112-1122.
  • Ward S (2018) Why Cloud Computing Is Ideal for Small Businesses.
  • Gong C, Liu J, Zhang Q, Chen H, Gong Z (2010) The Characteristics of Cloud Computing. 2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops pp. 275- 279, San Diego: IEEE Conference.
  • Lin A, Chen NC (2012) Cloud Computing as an innovation: Perception, attitude, and adoption. International Journal of Information Management pp. 533-540.
  • Alali FA, Yeh CL (2012) Cloud Computing: Overview and Risk Analysis. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS pp. 13-33.
  • Phaphoom N, Wang X, Samuel S, Helmer S, Abrahamsson P (2015) A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services. The Journal of Systems and Software pp. 167-181.
  • Ali O, Soar J, Yong J (2016) An investigation of the challenges and issues influencing the adoption of cloud computing in Australian regional municipal governments. Journal of Information Security and Applications pp. 19-34.
  • Ali O, Soar J, Shrestha A (2018) Perceived potential for value creation from cloud computing: a study of the Australian regional government sector. Behaviour & Information Technology pp. 1157-1176.
  • Faatz D, Morrow T (2018) Risks, Threats, and Vulnerabilities in Moving to the Cloud. Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute.
  • Amron MT, Ibrahim R, Bakar NA, Chuprat S (2019) Determining Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Cloud Computing Implementation. Procedia Computer Science pp. 1055-1063.
  • Baron, H., Heide, S., Mahmud, S., & Yeoh, J. (2021). State of Cloud Security Concerns, Challenges, and Incidents. Cloud Security Alliance.
  • Kuo AMH (2011) Opportunities and Challenges of Cloud Computing to Improve Health Care Services. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH pp. 1-15.
  • Khan N, Al-Yasiri A (2015) Framework for Cloud Computing Adoption: A Roadmap for SMEs to Cloud Migration. International Journal on Cloud Computing: Services and Architecture pp. 1-15.
  • Gupta A, Mazumdar BD, Mishra M, Shinde PP, Srivastava S, et al. (2021) Role of cloud computing in management and education. Materials Today: Proceedings pp. 1-4.
  • Gao L, Brink AG (2019) A Content Analysis of the Privacy Policies of Cloud Computing Services. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS pp. 93-115.
  • Lee L.S, Brink WD (2020) Trust in Cloud-Based Services: A Framework for Consumer Adoption of Software as a Service. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS pp. 65-85.
  • Vos A, Marinagi C, Trivellas P, Eberhagen N, Skourlas C, et al. (2014) Risk Reduction Strategies in Online Shopping: E-trust perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences pp. 418-423.
  • Habib S, Hamadneh NN (2021) Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability pp. 1-15.
  • United States (2021) Executive Order 14028 of May 12, 2021, on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity.
  • Gupta S, Saxena KB, Saini AK (2016) Towards Risk Managed Cloud Adoption A Conceptual Framework. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2012) Enterprise Risk Management for Cloud Computing. COSO.
  • Meritalk (2021) Do You Know Who is Responsible for Disaster Recovery in the Cloud? (Hint: It’s Not Your Cloud Provider).
  • Church KS, Schmidt PJ, Ajayi K (2020) Forecast Cloudy—Fair or Stormy Weather: Cloud Computing Insights and Issues. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS pp. 23-46.
  • Mehdar ZA (2022) Cybersecurity and cloud computing: Risks and benefits.
  • Guillén MÁ, Morales-Rocha V, Martínez LF (2020). A systematic review of security threats and countermeasures in SaaS. Journal of Computer Security pp. 635-653.
  • Kajiyama T, Jennex M, Addo T (2017) To cloud or not to cloud: how risks and threats are affecting cloud adoption decisions. Information & Computer Security pp. 634-659.
  • Grant K, Edgar D, Sukumar A, Meyer M (2014) Risky business’: Perceptions of e-business risk by UK small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Information Management pp. 99-122.
  • Davis F (1985) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-Use Information Systems: Theory and Results. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Ajzen I (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes pp. 179-211.
  • Attaran M, Woods J (2019) Cloud computing technology: improving small business performance using the Internet. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship pp. 495-519.
  • Doherty E, Carcary M, Conway G (2015) Migrating to the cloud: Examining the drivers and barriers to adoption of cloud computing by SMEs in Ireland: an exploratory study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development pp. 512-527.
  • Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research pp. 61-80.
  • Chauhan V, Yadav R, Choudhary V (2019) Analyzing the impact of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in internet banking adoption: A study of Indian consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing pp. 323-339.
  • Ho SM, Ocasio-Velázquez M, Booth C (2017) Trust or consequences? Causal effects of perceived risk and subjective norms on cloud technology adoption. Computers & Security pp. 581-595.
  • Ajzen I (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control- From Cognition to Behavior pp. 11-39.
  • Peter JP, Tarpey LX (1975) A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research pp. 29-37.
  • Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies pp. 451-474.
  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly pp. 319-339.
  • Yang Y, Wang X (2019) Modeling the intention to use machine translation for student translators: An extension of Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education pp. 116-126.
  • Al-Rahmi WM, Yahaya N, Aldraiweesh AA, Alamri MM, Aljarbo NA, et al. (2019) Integrating Technology Acceptance Model with Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students' Intention to Use E-Learning Systems. IEEE Access pp. 26797-26809.
  • Arpaci I (2019) Antecedents and consequences of cloud computing adoption in education to achieve knowledge management. Computers in Human Behavior pp. 382-390.
  • Joo S, Choi N, Harper LM (2019) Investigation of Factors That Influence Public Librarians’ Social Media Use for Marketing Purposes: An Adoption of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy pp. 137-155.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science.
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (2005) The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In D Albarracin, BT Johnson, MP Zanna (eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes pp. 173-221.
  • Jokonya O (2017) Critical Literature Review of Theory of Planned Behavior in the Information Systems Research. d International Conference on Advances in Management Engineering and Information Technology (AMEIT 2017) pp. 177-181, Shanghai.
  • Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Operations Research and the Management Sciences pp. 144-176.
  • Aziz RA, Mahmood R, Abdullah MH (2013) The Effects of Leadership Styles and Entrepreneurial Orientation on The Business Performance of SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies pp. 45-52.
  • Madanchian M, Taherdoost H (2017) Role of Leadership in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Economics and Management Systems pp. 240-243
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science pp. 982-1003.
  • Tohidinia Z, Mosakhani M (2010) Knowledge sharing behavior and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems pp. 611-631.
  • Kline P (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING pp. 159-168.
  • Saleh A, Bista K (2017) Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students. Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation pp. 63-74.
  • Hendra R, Hill A (2019) Rethinking Response Rates: New Evidence of Little Relationship Between Survey Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias. Education Review pp. 307-330.
  • Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. New York: Springer.
  • Wong KKK (2013) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmarPLS. Marketing Bulletin pp. 1-32.
  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science pp. 115-135.
  • Samani SA (2016) Steps in Research Process (Partial Least Square of Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Social Science and Business pp. 55-66.
  • Cepeda-Carrion G, Cegarra-Navarro JG, Cillo V (2019) Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management pp. 67-89.
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Rubin BJ, Anderson RE (2013) Multivariate data analysis with readings. Cengage.
  • Hulland J (1999) USE OF PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES (PLS) IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW OF FOUR RECENT STUDIES. Strategic Management Journal pp. 195-204.
  • Johansson JK, Yip GS (1994) EXPLOITING GLOBALIZATION POTENTIAL: U.S. AND JAPANESE STRATEGIES. Strategic Management Journal pp. 579-601.
  • Chen CF, Tsai D (2007) How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Management pp. 1115-1122.
  • Truong Y, McColl R (2011) Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services pp. 555-561.
  • Ertz M, Karakas F, Sarigöllü E (2016) Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research pp. 3971-3980.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research pp. 39-50.
  • Chin WW (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides, Modern Methods for Business Research pp. 295-336. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling In International Marketing. Advances in International Marketing pp. 277-319.
  • Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge Management: An Organizational Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems pp. 185-214.
  • Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management pp. 263-282.
  • Sullivan GM, Feinn R (2012) Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education pp. 279-282.
  • Geisser S (1974) A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika pp. 101-107.
  • Chin WW (2010) How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In VE Vinzi, WW Chin, J Henseler, H Wang (eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares pp. 655-690.
  • Deb M, Lomo-David E (2014) An empirical examination of customers’ adoption of m-banking in India. Marketing Intelligence & Planning pp. 475-494.
  • Park N, Rhoads M, Hou J, Lee KM (2014) Understanding the acceptance of teleconferencing systems among employees: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior pp. 118-127.
  • Chi T (2018) Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce- An extended TAM approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services pp. 274-284.
  • Hsiao CH, Tang KY (2014) Explaining undergraduates’ behavior intention of e-textbook adoption: Empirical assessment of five theoretical models. Library Hi Tech pp. 139-163.
  • Stein M, Campitelli V, Mezzio S (2020) Managing the Impact of Cloud Computing. The CPA Journal.
  • Khayer A, Jahan N, Hossain N, Hossain Y (2021) The adoption of cloud computing in small and medium enterprises: a developing country perspective. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems pp. 64-91.
  • AICPA (2022) TSP section 100 trust services principles and criteria for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality.
  • BDO Alliance (n.d.). Retrieved from BDO.
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly pp. 145-158.
  • Martins C, Oliveira T, Popovič A (2014) Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management pp. 1-13.
  • Citation
    Keywords
    Signup for Newsletter
    Scroll to Top