Case Report
Vagus Nerve Stimulation as An Adjunct in Postoperative Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report
Christian Riediger1*, Mark Ferl1, Martin Lohrengel1 and Maria Schönrogge1
Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
Corresponding AuthorDr. med. Christian Riediger, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Received Date: November 27, 2025; Published Date: December 03, 2025
Abstract
Case presentation: We describe a 67-year-old woman with persistent severe pain and delayed wound healing three weeks after elective total knee arthroplasty. Pain was rated 8/10 on the visual analogue scale (VAS) despite multimodal analgesia including 40 mg/day oxycodone. As part of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme, she received adjunctive transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS; 25 Hz, 250 µs, 30 minutes, five sessions per week, for four weeks) in addition to standard rehabilitation. Within two weeks, pain decreased to VAS 5 and opioid use was halved. By week three, pain improved to VAS 4 without rescue medication, and by week five, complete wound closure and further pain reduction (VAS 2) were achieved. No adverse effects occurred.
Keywords:Knee arthroplasty; Pain management; Postoperative rehabilitation; Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation; Vagus nerve stimulation; Wound healing
Keywords:LDS: Long duration sonophoresis; RICE: Rest ice compression elevation; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal ant-inflammatory drugs; COX- 1/COX2: Cyclooxygenase enzymes ½; CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; GROC: Global rate of change; NRS: Numeric rating scale
Background
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has established applications in neurology and rheumatology due to its analgesic and antiinflammatory properties mediated by the cholinergic antiinflammatory reflex [1, 2]. Preclinical and early clinical studies indicate potential benefits in musculoskeletal and perioperative settings [3-7]. However, reports on its use in orthopaedic rehabilitation are scarce. We present a case demonstrating adjunctive taVNS during postoperative rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Case presentation
A 67-year-old woman (BMI 29, medical history: left total hip arthroplasty in 2019, hypertension) presented with persistent pain and delayed wound healing three weeks after right TKA. Pain was rated VAS 8/10, and she required 40 mg/day oxycodone. Clinical findings included livid wound edges and serous discharge without signs of infection.
Intervention
As part of the rehabilitation programme, taVNS was applied using a commercially available auricular stimulation system (25 Hz, pulse width 250 µs, patient-adjusted intensity, 30 minutes/session, five sessions per week for four weeks). Standard physiotherapy, lymphatic drainage, and multimodal pharmacological analgesia continued.
Clinical Course
• Week 2: Pain decreased (VAS 5), oxycodone reduced to 20 mg/day. • Week 3: Pain improved to VAS 4, no rescue analgesics required. • Week 5: Complete wound closure, pain reduced to VAS 2, opioid-free. • Adverse events: None.
Table 1 summarises the clinical course. Figure 1 illustrates the reduction in pain and opioid consumption.
Table 1: Timeline of clinical course showing pain (VAS), oxycodone dose, and wound status.


Discussion
This case suggests that adjunctive taVNS can reduce pain, decrease opioid requirements, and accelerate wound healing in postoperative rehabilitation after TKA. These findings align with preclinical and pilot clinical studies reporting VNS-mediated suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhanced microcirculation [1-4, 8, 9]. Of particular relevance is the marked reduction in opioid use, a key challenge in postoperative pain management. Similar findings have been reported in recent clinical studies investigating taVNS for acute postoperative pain [5-7]. The progressive wound closure observed in our patient is consistent with experimental evidence that VNS can promote tissue repair and bone remodelling [8-10].
Limitations of this case include its single-patient nature, lack of biomarker monitoring, and potential placebo effects. Nonetheless, the absence of adverse events and the clear clinical improvements support the feasibility of integrating taVNS into orthopaedic rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation may represent a safe and practical adjunct in postoperative orthopaedic rehabilitation. Controlled clinical trials are warranted to determine its role, optimal parameters, and patient selection criteria.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not required for a single case report in accordance with institutional and national guidelines.
Consent for publication: Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and images was obtained from the patient.
Availability of data and materials: Not applicable.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding: We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication fund of medical faculty of the Otto-von-GuerickeUniversity Magdeburg.
Authors’ contributions: C.R. managed the patient and drafted the manuscript. M.F. performed the literature review. C.R. and M.L. contributed to manuscript revision. All authors approved the final version.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the rehabilitation team for their support.
References
- Pavlov V, Tracey KJ (2005) The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity19(6): 493-499.
- Tracey KJ (2007) Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest117(2): 289-296.
- Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, Grazio S, Sokolovic S, et al. (2016) Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(29): 8284-8289.
- Staats PS, Poree L (2021) Vagus nerve stimulation in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet Rheumatol. 3(1): e14.
- Yin ZY, Wang J, Wei P, Gao H, Sun L, et al. (2025) Impact of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing perianal surgery: a randomized trial. Ann Med 57(1): 2476045.
- Li Q, Zhao D, Zhang S, Du X, Ding N, et al. (2025) Case report: Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on acute pain after external fixation for bilateral open tibiofibular fractures. Front Neurosci 19: 1586632.
- Costa V, Gianlorenço AC, Andrade MF, Camargo L, Menacho M, et al. (2024) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation effects on chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Rep 9(5): e1171.
- Budhiraja A, Mehta A, Alhamo MA, Swedarsky R, Dahle S, et al. (2024) Vagus nerve stimulation: potential for treating chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 32(2): 108-117.
- Liu FJ, Wu J, Gong LJ, Yang HS, Chen H (2024) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in anti-inflammatory therapy: mechanistic insights and future perspectives. Front Neurosci 18: 1490300.
- Xia R, Peng H, Zhu X, Suolang W, Steve T L Pambayi, et al. (2025) Autonomic nervous system in bone remodeling: from mechanisms to novel therapies in orthopaedic diseases. Orthop Surg 17(6): 1561-1570.
-
Christian Riediger*, Mark Ferl, Martin Lohrengel and Maria Schönrogge. Vagus Nerve Stimulation as An Adjunct in Postoperative Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Glob J Ortho Res. 5(2): 2025. GJOR.MS.ID.000610.
-
Clinical Evaluation, Distal Radioulnar, Joint Dislocations, Postraumatic distal, Osteoarthritis, Wrist fractures, Hemiarthroplasty, Bower's score, Demerit, Gonimeter, Surgery, Radiologically Neutral anteroposterior, Neutral, Pronation, Supination
-

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






