Open Access Mini Review Article

Tibial Pilon fractures. A challenge for Orthopedics surgeons

Horacio Tabares Sáez1*, Horacio Tabares Neyra2

1Transilvania University of Brasov, Medical PhD School, Cuba

2Medical University of Havana, Cuba

Corresponding Author

Received Date: April 21, 2025;  Published Date:April 28, 2025

Abstract

Tibial Pilon fractures represent a major challenge for Orthopedics surgeons due to the presence of soft tissue injuries and the significant difficulty in treating them due to the variety of fracture features. The purpose of this article is to analyze the most relevant data on these fractures regarding the difficulty of treating them. References were identified by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elsevier for publications from 2013 to 2025. These are rare fractures, accounting for between 3% and 10% of tibial fractures and less than 1% of lower extremity fractures. They result from high-energy trauma with an axial force, which causes the tibial plateau to rupture on the talus. Several classification systems exist. They are recognized as some of the most difficult fractures to treat, associated with a high incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis later in life. Surgical treatment, as well as postoperative rehabilitation, must be optimal.

Introduction

A tibial Pilon fracture is a fracture of the distal metaphysis of the tibia that extends to the ankle joint. Initially described in 1911 by Étienne Destot, who used the French word “Pilon” to describe the mechanical interaction between the distal end of the tibia and the talus. The term “Pilon” (mortar) refers to the traumatic mechanism involved in these fractures, which is the generation of force vectors from the tibial tip in an axial direction on the talus as a result of the energy released during trauma.[1,2] Although uncommon, they pose a major challenge to traumatologists; this is due to the possible presence of associated soft tissue injuries and the great difficulty of their treatment due to the diversity of possible fracture lines. Lower extremity trauma is considered one of the most serious and compromising injuries to this region of the human body [3].

This injury accounts for less than 1% of all lower extremity fractures, and its causes include falls from heights, car accidents, accidents during sports, and other everyday accidents [4]. The purpose of this review article is to analyze the most relevant data regarding these fractures and their difficulty in treating them.

Search strategy and selection criteria:

References were identified by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elsevier for publications published between 2013 and 2025 in English using the terms “tibial Pilon fractures,” “fractures of the distal end of the tibia,” and “metaphyseal-articular fractures of the distal tibia.” Articles accessible either freely or through the Clinical Key and Hinari services were also reviewed.

Development:

Tibial Pilon fractures are rare, accounting for 3% to 10% of all tibial fractures and less than 1% of lower extremity fractures. They comprise 2% to 5% of all tibiotalar-fibular joint fractures, depending on the criteria. Men suffer these injuries more frequently than women, and most injuries occur between the fourth and fifth decades of life, with a bimodal peak between 25 and 50 years of age. In 75% to 90% of cases, the fibula is fractured. Tibial Pilon fractures with an intact fibula occur in 10–25% of cases, and recent studies have suggested that tibial Pilon fractures are likely less comminated and less severe when the fibula remains intact [5–7].

Tibial Pilon fractures result from high-energy trauma with a large axial force, which causes the tibial plafond to rupture over the talus. [8,9] The distal tibia has a relatively thin soft tissue envelope that is prone to injury in high-energy trauma. The high energy surrounding these fractures also causes severe damage to the surrounding soft tissues [10,11]. Several classification systems for tibial Pilon fractures have been described. Lauge Hansen,[12] Rüedi and Allgöwer,[13] Ovadia and Beals,[14] AO/OTA,[15] Topliss,[16] and Leonetti and Tigani,[17] based on CT studies, is the most widely used currently. Tibial Pilon fractures are recognized as some of the most difficult fractures to treat and are associated with a high incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis later in life. Surgical treatment should be optimal, as should postoperative rehabilitation. Deformity, functional impairment, and edema are classic clinical signs of most fractures, and imaging evaluation is important. Imaging should not only consider the distal tibia, ankle, and mortise, but also include other sites.

Conclusion

Tibial Pilon fractures are recognized as among the most difficult fractures to treat. A proper understanding of the fracture mechanism and its correct classification constitute the basis for appropriate management, taking into account the soft tissue status of the injured area.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

    1. 9Hill DS, Davis JR (2023) What is a tibial Pilon fracture and how should they be acutely managed?  A survey of consultant British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society members and non-members. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
    2. Destot E (1911) Traumatisme du pied et rayons X. Masson, Paris.
    3. Murawski CD, Mittwede PN, Wawrose RA, Belayneh R, Tarkin IS (2023) Management of high-energy tibial Pilon fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(14): 1123-1137.
    4. Lineham B, Faraj A, Hammet F, Elizabeth B, Yvonne H, et al., (2024) Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-Articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures. Orthop Proc 106-B(Supp_5): 11-11.
    5. López-Prats F, Sirera J, Suso S (2004) Fracturas del pilón tibial. Rev Ortop Traumatol 48(6): 470-483.
    6. Rodriguez Castells F (2020) Fracturas del pilón tibial. Rev. Asoc. Arg. Ortop. y Traumatol 61(3): 312-321.
    7. Das M, Pandey S, Gupta H, Bidary S, Das A (2023) Clinical characteristics and outcome of tibial pilon fractures treated with open reduction and plating in a tertiary medical college. Journal of Gandaki Medical College 16(2).
    8. Luo TD, Pilson H. (2022) Pilon Fracture. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing [Internet].
    9. Mair O, Pflüger P, Hoffeld K, Braun KF, Kirchhoff Ch, et al., (2021) Management of Pilon Fractures. Current Concepts. Front Surg 8: 764232.
    10. Faber RM, Parry JA, Haidukewych GH, Koval KJ, Langford JL (2021) Complications after fibula intramedullary nail fixation of pilon versus ankle fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 16: 75-79.
    11. Daniels NF, Lim JA, Thahir A, Krkovic M (2021) Open pilon fracture postoperative outcomes with definitive surgical management options: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg 9(3): 272-282.
    12. Lauge-Hansen N (1953) Fractures of the ankle. Arch Surg 67: 813-20.
    13. Rüedi TP, Allgöwer M. (1979) The operative treatment of intraarticular fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138: 105-110.
    14. Ovadia DN, Beals RK (1986) Fractures of the tibial plafond. J Bone Jt Surg 68-A:543.
    15. (1996) Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for coding and classification. Fractures and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma 10(Suppl 1): 57-8.
    16. Topliss CJ, Jackson M, Atkins RM (2005) Anatomy of pilon fractures of the distal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(5): 692-697.
    17. Leonetti D, Tigani D (2017) Pilon fractures: A new classification system based on CTscan. Injury 48(10): 2311-2317.
Citation
Keywords
Signup for Newsletter
Scroll to Top