Research Article
Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Two Prestressed Girder Bridges
Mehrdad Aghagholizadeh1* and Necati Catbas2
1Southern Methodist University, USA
2University of Central Florida, USA
Mehrdad Aghagholizadeh, Lecturer, Southern Methodist University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dallas, TX, USA.
Received Date: August 24, 2019 Published Date: September 11, 2019
Abstract
A comparative analysis of two bridges constructed with the most commonly used girder types in Florida is carried out. The girder types that the bridges are employed for this study are AASHTO Type III (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) and Florida I-Beam. Two bridges that have exactly the same specifications but with different girder type are analyzed under baseline state and different prestress loss cases. Finite element models of these bridges are utilized, and the FE models are subjected to two types of virtual load tests of Florida legal loads namely C5 and SU4. Florida I-Beam tends to have higher load carrying capacity, higher lateral stiffness, cost efficiency and better element level reliability when compared to AASHTO Type girders.
Keywords: Florida I-Beam; AASHTO Type girder; Prestressed concrete; Load rating factor; Bridge reliability; Prestress loss; Virtual load test
-
Mehrdad Aghagholizadeh, Necati Catbas. Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Two Prestressed Girder Bridges. Cur Trends Civil & Struct Eng. 3(5): 2019. CTCSE.MS.ID.000572.
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.