Advancements In Microsurgical Techniques for Hand Trauma: A Comprehensive Review

In the intricate landscape of hand trauma management, the evolution of microsurgical techniques stands as a testament to the relentless pursuit of precision and efficacy in surgical interventions [1]. Microsurgery, with its meticulous focus on submillimeter anastomoses and delicate tissue manipulation, has revolutionized the landscape of hand trauma reconstruction [1]. As we embark on this comprehensive review, we aim to dissect the significance of microsurgical techniques in the context of hand trauma, traverse through the historical trajectory that has shaped its contemporary landscape, and delineate the intricate interplay between evolving strategies for nerve repair and the management of open fractures and soft tissue injuries [1].

Significance of Microsurgical Techniques in Hand Trauma

The human hand, with its intricate architecture and multifaceted functionality, demands surgical approaches that transcend conventional methodologies. Microsurgical techniques have emerged as indispensable tools in the armamentarium of hand surgeons, facilitating the meticulous repair of delicate structures and intricate vascular networks [2]. The nuanced precision afforded by microsurgery not only restores form and function but also minimizes postoperative morbidity, accentuating the importance of these techniques in the broader canvas of hand trauma management.

Historical Context and Evolution of Microsurgery in Hand Trauma

To truly appreciate the current zenith of microsurgical techniques in hand trauma, a journey through their historical evolution is imperative. From the pioneering efforts of Sir Harold Delf Gillies in the early 20th century to the refinement of vascular anastomosis techniques by Dr. Julius Jacobson in the 1960s, the trajectory of microsurgery has been marked by relentless innovation [3]. The amalgamation of technological advancements, including the development of operating microscopes and fine suture materials, has propelled microsurgery from a niche discipline to a cornerstone of modern hand trauma reconstruction [3].

Scope and Aim of the Review

This review aims to meticulously navigate the landscape of advancements in microsurgical techniques for hand trauma, offering a panoramic view of their applications, innovations, and outcomes. Furthermore, it will delve into emerging trends in nerve repair strategies and provide updates on the dynamic field of managing open fractures and soft tissue injuries. By synthesizing the latest research findings and clinical experiences, this comprehensive exploration seeks to serve as a beacon for clinicians and researchers, fostering a deeper understanding of the current state of microsurgery in the realm of hand trauma.

Flap Reconstructions: Precision in Tissue Restoration

The realm of microsurgery in hand trauma is intricately woven with the artistry of flap reconstructions. Flap techniques, ranging from local flaps to free tissue transfers, provide versatile solutions for the intricate three-dimensional reconstruction of soft tissue defects [4]. Pioneering studies by Malt and McKhann in the 1970s laid the groundwork for the widespread adoption of microsurgical flaps. Contemporary innovations, such as perforator flaps and super microsurgery, have expanded the repertoire, allowing for tailored solutions to diverse hand injuries [4]. The integration of imaging modalities, such as indocyanine green angiography, has further refined flap design, ensured optimal tissue perfusion and reduced postoperative complications [4].

Anastomosis Mastery: Navigating the Microvascular Landscape

At the heart of microsurgery lies the mastery of anastomosis, a fundamental skill underpinning successful vascular repairs. Pivotal studies by Taylor and Palmer in the mid-20th century propelled microvascular anastomosis into the forefront of surgical techniques [2]. The advent of operating microscopes and finer suture materials has since facilitated increasingly sophisticated vascular repairs. Recent breakthroughs in sutureless techniques, such as vascular couplers and bioadhesive agents, promise to further streamline anastomotic procedures, reducing operative times and enhancing precision [5].

Vascular Repairs: Precision in Circulatory Restoration

The delicate vascular architecture of the hand demands a nuanced approach to vascular repairs. Microsurgical interventions for vessel injuries, ranging from simple repairs to complex revascularization procedures, have witnessed transformative advancements [6]. Studies by Tamai and Matsui in the 1970s laid the foundation for successful replantation surgeries, marking a paradigm shift in the management of traumatic amputations. Contemporary innovations, including supermicrosurgery and composite tissue allotransplantation, continue to push the boundaries of what is achievable in vascular repairs for hand trauma [7].

Outcomes and Success Rates: Navigating the Clinical Landscape

A critical evaluation of microsurgical interventions necessitates an exploration of clinical outcomes and success rates across different hand injuries. Comprehensive studies, such as the landmark work by Wei and Mardini, have demonstrated high success rates in microsurgical reconstructions, especially in the realm of replantation and revascularization [7]. The application of microsurgery in complex trauma scenarios, such as crush injuries and avulsion wounds, has showcased the adaptability of these techniques. However, a nuanced understanding of factors influencing outcomes, including patient selection, timing of intervention, and postoperative care, remains imperative for optimizing success rates [6].

Future Horizons: From Biotechnology to Enhanced Imaging

As we stand at the precipice of the third decade of the 21st century, the future horizons of microsurgery in hand trauma beckon with promise. Biotechnological advancements, including tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, hold the potential to revolutionise tissue reconstruction paradigms [6]. Enhanced imaging modalities, such as intraoperative fluorescence and artificial intelligence applications, promise to further refine surgical planning and execution. A holistic understanding of these future trends is essential for steering the course of microsurgery towards ever greater precision and efficacy [8].

Advancements in Nerve Repair Techniques: Precision in Neural Reconstruction

The intricate neural network of the hand demands meticulous attention in the aftermath of trauma. Recent years have witnessed a paradigm shift in nerve repair strategies, driven by advancements in regenerative medicine and biomaterial sciences [8]. Cuttingedge techniques, such as end-to-end repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfers, form the cornerstone of contemporary approaches to restoring neural function. The advent of super microsurgery has further refined these techniques, enabling intricate nerve coaptations with unprecedented precision.

Nerve Conduits: Bridging the Gap in Neural Rehabilitation

The evolution of nerve conduits represents a transformative leap in nerve repair strategies. These bioengineered tubes, composed of various materials such as collagen, polyglycolic acid, and polycaprolactone, provide a scaffold for guided nerve regeneration. Recent studies, including groundbreaking work by Daly et al., underscore the potential of nerve conduits in bridging nerve gaps, particularly in cases where autografts may be suboptimal [9]. The integration of growth factors and cell-based therapies into nerve conduits holds promise in enhancing axonal regeneration and functional recovery.

Autografts and Allografts: Balancing Tradition and Innovation

Autografts, long considered the gold standard in nerve repair, continue to play a pivotal role in reconstructive strategies. Innovations in autograft harvesting techniques, such as the use of nerve-muscle grafts, aim to optimize donor site morbidity while maximizing functional outcomes [10]. Concurrently, allografts present an attractive alternative, circumventing the need for donor site sacrifice. The works of Rbia and Bertleff have contributed to our understanding of the efficacy and immunological considerations associated with allograft use in nerve repair [11, 12].

Tissue Engineering: A Biotechnological Odyssey in Neural Rehabilitation

The intersection of tissue engineering and nerve repair heralds a new era in regenerative medicine. Bioengineered nerve grafts, seeded with Schwann cells, neural stem cells, or extracellular matrix components, represent a frontier in neural rehabilitation [11]. Studies by Gordon et al. showcase the potential of tissueengineered constructs in promoting axonal growth and myelination. The symbiosis of biomaterials and living cells holds the key to overcoming the inherent challenges of nerve repair, promising more durable and effective solutions in the future [13].

Outcomes and Challenges: Navigating the Neural Landscape

While the landscape of emerging nerve repair strategies is adorned with promises, it is imperative to critically evaluate their outcomes and address associated challenges. Comprehensive metaanalyses, such as the systematic review by Kuffler et al., shed light on the efficacy of different techniques in achieving meaningful functional recovery [14]. Challenges such as immune response, donor site morbidity, and the need for standardization in outcome assessments underscore the intricacies of translating emerging trends into clinical success.

Future Perspectives: Towards Precision Neural Reconstruction

As we stand on the precipice of a new era in nerve repair, the future beckons with prospects of precision neural reconstruction. Advances in gene therapy, neurostimulation, and personalized medicine are poised to reshape the landscape of nerve repair strategies [13]. A nuanced understanding of the interplay between emerging technologies and clinical applications is essential for steering the trajectory of neural rehabilitation towards enhanced outcomes and improved patient-centric care [14].

Contemporary Approaches to Managing Open Fractures: Precision in Trauma Care

The management of open fractures and associated soft tissue injuries in hand trauma demands a multidimensional approach that integrates contemporary surgical strategies and advances in trauma care [15]. Current approaches emphasise the importance of a systematic evaluation, aligning with the principles of damage control orthopaedics. Early recognition and classification of open fractures according to Gustilo-Anderson criteria guide subsequent therapeutic decisions. Advances in imaging modalities, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, aid in precise delineation of the extent of injury, enabling tailored treatment plans [15].

Early Intervention: A Crucial Pillar in Preventing Complications

Time is of the essence in the management of open fractures, underscoring the significance of early intervention. Swift initiation of surgical debridement, ideally within the golden period of six hours post-injury, remains a cornerstone in preventing complications [16]. The works of Patzakis and Wilkins have underscored the critical role of early intervention in reducing the risk of infection and promoting optimal fracture healing. However, a nuanced understanding of individual patient factors, injury characteristics, and logistical constraints is essential for pragmatic decisionmaking regarding the timing of surgical interventions [16].

Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Precision in Infectious Risk Mitigation

Antibiotic prophylaxis plays a pivotal role in mitigating the infectious risks associated with open fractures. The selection of appropriate antibiotics, guided by local antibiograms and the principles of targeted therapy, is paramount [17]. The advent of prophylactic antibiotic-coated implants, as explored in studies by Metsemakers et al., offers a promising avenue to further reduce infection rates. However, the delicate balance between preventing infections and avoiding antibiotic resistance necessitates continuous scrutiny and adherence to evidence-based guidelines [18].

Wound Care Strategies: Orchestrating the Healing Symphony

The orchestration of wound care in open fractures involves a meticulous blend of surgical debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and advanced dressings. Contemporary studies by Schaffer et al. highlight the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in promoting wound healing and reducing infection rates. The integration of regenerative medicine, including platelet-rich plasma and growth factor applications, showcases the evolving landscape of wound care strategies [18]. Tailoring wound care to the specific needs of each patient, considering factors such as tissue viability and systemic health, remains imperative for optimal outcomes.

Surgical Techniques: Debridement, Fixation, and Soft Tissue Reconstruction

The triad of surgical techniques - debridement, fixation, and soft tissue reconstruction - constitutes the bedrock of open fracture management. Surgical debridement, guided by the principles of radical excision of devitalized tissue, sets the stage for subsequent interventions [18]. Advances in fixation techniques, including locking plates and intramedullary nails, contribute to stable constructs that facilitate early mobilization. Soft tissue reconstruction, ranging from local flaps to microsurgical free tissue transfers, seeks to restore form and function, bridging the gap between trauma and rehabilitation.

Outcomes Evaluation: Navigating the Complex Trajectory

Evaluation of outcomes in the management of open fractures requires a comprehensive understanding of functional, radiological, and patient-reported parameters. Meta-analyses, such as the comprehensive review by Zalavras et al., provide insights into the comparative effectiveness of different surgical approaches [19]. The assessment of complications, including infections, malunions, and non-unions, guides the refinement of treatment algorithms. Patient satisfaction and quality of life assessments offer a patient-centric perspective, influencing future advancements in trauma care [20].

Synergies Between Microsurgical Techniques and Nerve Repair Strategies

The management of hand trauma transcends isolated approaches, necessitating an integration of microsurgical techniques and nerve repair strategies for optimal outcomes. The intricate neural network, vascular structures, and soft tissues demand a cohesive strategy that seamlessly combines the precision of microsurgery with the intricacies of nerve repair. Studies such as the seminal work by Mackinnon and Dellon underscore the interplay between neural regeneration and microsurgical interventions. The confluence of these techniques aims not only at structural reconstruction but also at restoring the neurovascular dynamics critical for functional recovery [21].

Multidisciplinary Collaborations: A Paradigm Shift in Trauma Care

The paradigm shift in hand trauma management embraces multidisciplinary collaborations, bringing together plastic surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and rehabilitation specialists. The fusion of expertise from various disciplines not only enriches the diagnostic and therapeutic arsenal but also provides a holistic approach to patient care [22]. Collaborative decisionmaking, as elucidated in studies by Jando et al., ensures that the nuances of microsurgery, nerve repair, and trauma management are seamlessly integrated into a unified treatment plan [21].

Comprehensive Treatment Plans: Orchestrating Patient- Centric Care

Optimal patient outcomes in hand trauma hinge on the orchestration of comprehensive treatment plans tailored to individual needs [23]. Beyond the operating theatre, the trajectory of care encompasses preoperative optimization, perioperative management, and postoperative rehabilitation. A paradigmatic shift towards evidence-based protocols, as exemplified in the work of Chung et al., ensures standardized yet adaptable approaches [24]. The inclusion of patient-centric parameters, such as quality of life assessments and functional outcomes, guides the refinement of comprehensive treatment plans.

Rehabilitation Protocols: Bridging Surgical Intervention and Functional Recovery

The integration of microsurgical techniques and nerve repair strategies culminates in the postoperative phase, where rehabilitation protocols bridge the gap between surgical intervention and functional recovery [25]. Collaborative efforts between surgeons and rehabilitation specialists, as observed in studies by Novak and Mackinnon, align rehabilitation goals with the intricacies of neural regeneration and tissue healing [26]. Early mobilization, targeted physiotherapy, and adaptive strategies contribute to the optimization of functional outcomes, ensuring that patients regain not only form but also functionality

Patient-Centred Outcomes: Navigating the Trajectory of Care

The success of integrative approaches in hand trauma management is ultimately gauged by patient-centered outcomes. Beyond the technical proficiency of surgical interventions, the impact on quality of life, psychological well-being, and societal reintegration is paramount. Patient-reported outcome measures, as championed by Chung et al., offer insights into the subjective experiences of individuals undergoing complex hand trauma management [27]. Understanding and addressing patient concerns, expectations, and aspirations become integral components of the ongoing discourse in refining integrative approaches.

Future Horizons: Advancing Synergies for Enhanced Care

The trajectory of integrative approaches in hand trauma management extends towards future horizons, where advancements in technology, biomaterials, and personalized medicine hold the promise of further enhancing synergies. The integration of artificial intelligence in treatment planning, the advent of patient-specific implants, and innovations in rehabilitation technologies are poised to redefine the landscape. A futuristic outlook necessitates a continual dialogue between clinicians, researchers, and technologists to steer the course towards ever-evolving excellence in patient care.

Potential Future Developments in Microsurgery for Hand Trauma

The landscape of microsurgery for hand trauma is poised for transformative advancements that hold the promise of reshaping the field in the coming years. Potential developments include the integration of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) into surgical planning, offering surgeons enhanced visualizations and precision. The advent of smart materials with built-in therapeutic functionalities may revolutionize tissue engineering approaches, enabling more efficient and tailored reconstructions. Furthermore, advances in neurostimulation techniques and neuromodulation devices may play a pivotal role in augmenting neural regeneration following trauma.

Ongoing Research: Unveiling the Uncharted Territories

The quest for excellence in microsurgery for hand trauma is perpetuated by ongoing research endeavors that unravel uncharted territories. Current investigations delve into the molecular mechanisms underlying nerve regeneration, seeking to unlock novel therapeutic targets. Emerging studies explore the potential of gene-editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, in manipulating cellular responses for improved tissue healing. The intersection of microsurgery with nanotechnology is also an area of active exploration, aiming to enhance drug delivery systems and biomaterial functionalities for more precise interventions.

Emerging Technologies: A Technological Odyssey in Surgical Innovation

The technological odyssey in surgical innovation is propelled by emerging technologies that have the potential to redefine microsurgery for hand trauma. Robotics-assisted microsurgery, exemplified by the Da Vinci Surgical System, may usher in an era of enhanced dexterity and minimally invasive interventions [27]. Three-dimensional bioprinting holds promise in creating personalized tissue constructs, revolutionizing the landscape of flap reconstructions. Additionally, artificial intelligence algorithms may assist in surgical decision-making, predicting outcomes and optimizing treatment plans based on vast datasets.

Areas for Improvement: Navigating the Path to Perfection

While the future of microsurgery in hand trauma is marked by optimism, challenges and areas for improvement must be acknowledged. The refinement of microsurgical skills through simulation training remains a priority to ensure consistent proficiency among surgeons. Standardization of outcome measures and the establishment of multicenter collaborations can address the heterogeneity in research findings and facilitate evidence-based advancements. Moreover, advancements in technology must be accompanied by considerations of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and ethical implications, ensuring equitable distribution and ethical use.

Challenges and Limitations: Grounding Aspirations in Reality

The realization of future advancements in microsurgery for hand trauma is impeded by inherent challenges and limitations. The intricacies of neural regeneration, despite ongoing research, pose a formidable challenge, necessitating a nuanced understanding of the molecular and cellular nuances involved. Technological integration introduces challenges related to the learning curve, cost, and potential complications, emphasizing the importance of a cautious and iterative approach. Moreover, the translation of research findings into clinical practice requires overcoming regulatory hurdles, garnering acceptance within the medical community, and addressing ethical concerns associated with novel interventions.

Ethical Considerations: Balancing Progress and Patient Welfare

As we traverse the path of innovation in microsurgery for hand trauma, ethical considerations must guide each stride. Balancing the pursuit of progress with patient welfare mandates a vigilant approach to patient consent, privacy, and the equitable distribution of emerging technologies. Ethical frameworks must evolve in tandem with technological advancements, ensuring that patient autonomy, beneficence, and justice remain at the forefront of decision-making. Transparent communication and collaboration with regulatory bodies are imperative to establish ethical standards that withstand the tests of evolving landscapes.

In the intricate realm of hand trauma management, the evolution of microsurgical techniques stands as a beacon of precision, offering transformative solutions that transcend the boundaries of conventional methodologies. This comprehensive review has traversed the landscape of advancements in microsurgery for hand trauma, exploring synergies with nerve repair strategies, contemporary approaches to managing open fractures, and integrative models of care. As we draw the curtains on this exploration, the imperative of continuous advancements in microsurgical techniques emerges as the linchpin for elevating outcomes in hand trauma.

The delicate structures and intricate dynamics of the hand demand a surgical approach that mirrors the intricacies of its architecture. Microsurgery, with its focus on submillimeter precision, vascular anastomosis, and tissue reconstruction, has not only become a cornerstone in hand trauma management but a driving force for excellence. The synergies between microsurgical techniques, nerve repair strategies, and the management of open fractures converge in a symphony of care that seeks not only to restore form but also to reignite function.

The future of microsurgery for hand trauma holds promise marked by ongoing research, emerging technologies, and collaborative efforts that transcend disciplinary boundaries. From the integration of augmented reality and robotics into surgical planning to the potential of gene-editing technologies and threedimensional bioprinting, the trajectory of innovation is boundless. However, with this boundless potential come challenges - challenges in refining skills, standardizing outcomes, ensuring ethical use, and translating innovations into accessible and equitable clinical practice.

As we stand at the nexus of tradition and innovation, it is imperative to underscore the ethical considerations that must guide our journey forward. Patient welfare, autonomy, and justice must remain steadfast in the face of technological strides, ensuring that the benefits of microsurgical advancements are distributed equitably and ethically. Continuous dialogue between clinicians, researchers, regulatory bodies, and technologists is essential to strike the delicate balance between progress and patient-centric care.

In conclusion, the importance of continuous advancements in microsurgical techniques for improving outcomes in hand trauma is not merely a scientific endeavor but a pledge to the patients entrusting their well-being to the hands of skilled practitioners. As we embrace the challenges, navigate uncharted territories, and usher in the era of innovative excellence, the commitment to refining microsurgical techniques stands as a testament to our unwavering dedication to the art and science of healing. In this continuous pursuit, we pave the way for a future where hand trauma is not merely repaired but meticulously crafted towards optimal form and function, promising a brighter chapter in the narrative of surgical excellence.

None.

No conflict of interest.

1. Sabapathy SR, Satbhai NG (2014) Microsurgery in the urgent and emergent management of the hand. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 7(1): 40-46.
2. Koskinen J, Huotarinen A, Elomaa AP, Zheng B, Bednarik R (2022) Movement-level process modeling of microsurgical bimanual and unimanual tasks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 17(2): 305-314.
3. Wang T, Li H, Pu T, Yang L (2023) Microsurgery Robots: Applications, Design, and Development. Sensors (Basel) 23(20): 8503.
4. Badash I, Gould DJ, Patel KM (2018) Supermicrosurgery: History, Applications, Training and the Future. Front Surg 5: 23.
5. Juratli MA, Becker F, Palmes D, Stöppeler S, Bahde R, et al. (2021) Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists: a 10-year experience at the Münster University Hospital. BMC Med Educ 21(1): 295.
6. Hayakawa M, Fujiki K, Kanai A, Matsumura M, Honda Y, et al. (1997) Multicenter genetic study of retinitis pigmentosa in Japan: II. Prevalence of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol 41(1): 7-11.
7. Salem M, Tainsh RE, Bromberg J, Loriaux DL, Chernow B (1994) Perioperative glucocorticoid coverage. A reassessment 42 years after emergence of a problem. Ann Surg 219(4): 416-425.
8. Sutton PA, Van Dam MA, Cahill RA, Mieog S, Polom K, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery: comprehensive review. BJS Open 7(3): zrad049.
9. Sahar MSU, Barton M, Tansley GD (2019) Bridging larger gaps in peripheral nerves using neural prosthetics and physical therapeutic agents. Neural Regen Res 14(7): 1109-1115.
10. Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE (2010) Management of nerve gaps: Autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol 223(1): 77-85.
11. Gao Y, Wang Y ling, Kong D, Qu B, Su X jing, et al. (2015) Nerve autografts and tissue-engineered materials for the repair of peripheral nerve injuries: a 5-year bibliometric analysis. Neural Regen Res 10(6): 1003-1008.
12. Roballo KCS, Gigley JP, Smith TA, Bittner GD, Bushman JS (2021) Functional and immunological peculiarities of peripheral nerve allografts. Neural Regen Res 17(4): 721-727.
13. Wang S, Wang H, Lu P, Gong L, Gu X, et al. (2023) Mechanisms underlying the cell-matrixed nerve grafts repairing peripheral nerve defects. Bioact Mater 31: 563-577.
14. Johnson PJ, Wood MD, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE (2013) Tissue engineered constructs for peripheral nerve surgery. Eur Surg 45(3).
15. Hannigan GD, Pulos N, Grice EA, Mehta S (2015) Current Concepts and Ongoing Research in the Prevention and Treatment of Open Fracture Infections. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 4(1): 59-74.
16. Minehara H, Maruo A, Amadei R, Contini A, Braile A, et al. (2023) Open fractures: Current treatment perspective. OTA Int 6(3 Suppl): e240.
17. Pressato D, Battista A, Govoni M, Vivarelli L, Dallari D, et al. (2023) The Intraoperative Use of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC®) in the Form of a Gel to Prevent Peri-Implant Infections in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Clinical Narrative Review. Materials (Basel) 16(15): 5304.
18. De Meo D, Cera G, Pica R, Perfetti F, Martini P, et al. (2023) Antibiotic-Loaded Coatings to Reduce Fracture-Related Infections: Retrospective Case Series of Patients with Increased Infectious Risk. Antibiotics (Basel) 12(2): 287.
19. Zalavras C, Marcus R, Levin L, Patzakis M (2008) Management of Open Fractures and Subsequent Complications. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 57: 51-63.
20. Zalavras C, Thordarson D (2007) Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(6): 330-339.
21. (2015) Repair, protection and regeneration of peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regen Res 10(11): 1777-1798.
22. Stocco E, Barbon S, Emmi A, Tiengo C, Macchi V, et al. (2023) Bridging Gaps in Peripheral Nerves: From Current Strategies to Future Perspectives in Conduit Design. Int J Mol Sci 24(11): 9170.
23. Ghițan Af, Gheorman V, Pîrvu D, Gheorman V, Udriștoiu I, et al. (2023) A Review of Psychological Outcomes in Patients with Complex Hand Trauma: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Curr Health Sci J 49(2): 143-150.
24. Dacombe PJ, Amirfeyz R, Davis T (2016) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma. Hand (N Y) 11(1): 11-21.
25. Keller MM, Jordaan PW (2004) Traumatic hand injury management and outcomes: A case report. S Afr Fam Pract 64(1): 5479.
26. Nuelle JAV, Bozynski C, Stoker A (2022) Innovations in Peripheral Nerve Injury: Current Concepts and Emerging Techniques to Improve Recovery. Mo Med 119(2): 129-135.
27. Reddy K, Gharde P, Tayade H, Patil M, Reddy LS, et al. (2023) Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Utilizations and Upcoming Frontiers. Cureus 15(12): e50415.