Mini Review
One If by Vaginal, Two If by C (Section): An Argument for Vaginal Delivery for Hemophilia A Carriers with Male Fetuses
Gregory W Kirschen1, Jennifer Pollard2 and Kimberly Herrera2*
1Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP), Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, USA
2Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, USA
Kimberly Herrera, Assistant Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, USA.
Received Date: November 04, 2019; Published Date: November 13, 2019
Abstract
Disorders of coagulation such as hemophilia can have profound effects on health and development beginning in the early stages of life, including pregnancy. With regard to mode of delivery planning for hemophilia A carriers bearing affected fetuses, there is little literature to guide practice and there remains little consensus regarding optimal mode of delivery. Importantly, most of the existing literature focuses solely on risk to the fetus without consideration of risk to the mother. We discuss the complex management decisions and present an argument for vaginal delivery as the “default” option, in the absence of strong maternal or fetal indications for cesarean delivery.
Keywords: Bleeding disorder; Mode of delivery; Intracranial hemorrhage; Postpartum hemorrhage
-
Kimberly Herrera, Gregory W Kirschen, Jennifer Pollard. One If by Vaginal, Two If by C (Section): An Argument for Vaginal Delivery for Hemophilia A Carriers with Male Fetuses. Arch Clin Case Stud. 2(1): 2019. ACCS.MS.ID.000527.
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.