Relative Performance Index in Triathlon

The aim of this study is to establish a relative performance measure that can be used to compare the performance of athletes, contemporaries and/or over time, as well as rank current athletes. Twenty-four (n=24) athletes were selected for analysis. The selection criterion was to have figured at least five times in the top 10 in the IRONMAN© World Championship in Hawaii. The proposed model proposal was able to measure the relative performance of athletes, based on the comparison of their performance with the average performance of their competitors, adjusted by the standard deviation of the average performance of the competitors. The overall performance ranking of the 24 selected athletes was calculated, as well as the ranking by modality (swimming, cycling, and running) for each of the competitors. A relative performance measure, based on effect size, and considering the performance of each athlete in relation to the average performance of the other competitors, can be an additional instrument to evaluate the relative performance of the athletes, as well as to assist coaches and athletes in search of better performance.

List of Abbreviations: ARPI: Adjusted Relative Performance Index; ADRPIF: Adjusted Relative Performance Index Family; ARPIg: Adjusted Relative Performance Index–Global; ARPIs: Adjusted Relative Performance Index–Swimming; ARPIn: Adjusted Relative Performance Index n; ARPIcic: Adjusted Relative Performance Index–Cycling; ARPIrun: Adjusted Relative Performance Index–Running; ARPIcor: Adjusted Relative Performance Index–Run Stage; Rcor: Run Correlation; CBScic: Correlations Between Swimming and Cycling; CBCrun: Correlations Between Cycling and Running